Undergrad Is the top quark stable in the absence of the Higgs field?

Click For Summary
In a universe without the Higgs field, fermions would be massless, making it impossible to distinguish between particles like electrons, muons, and tau leptons. The discussion highlights that Yukawa couplings, which are responsible for mass differentiation in our universe, would not exist in a Higgs-less scenario. Without these couplings, all generations of fermions would behave identically, leading to indistinguishable properties. The conversation also touches on theories like MSSM and GUT, which propose multiple Higgs fields that could affect fermion masses differently. Ultimately, the absence of the Higgs field results in a lack of distinct particle identities and interactions in such a universe.
  • #31
Orodruin said:
Yes, but you would likely have to give a very good argument as to why these fields would not couple to all fermions as allowed by the quantum numbers.

are there any proposals to extend the SM with additional degree of freedom and quantum numbers, to allow for a "higgs charge" so that second and third generation fermions have more higgs-charge than first generation via yukawa coupling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
kodama said:
are there any proposals to extend the SM with additional degree of freedom and quantum numbers, to allow for a "higgs charge" so that second and third generation fermions have more higgs-charge than first generation via yukawa coupling?
What do you think the Yukawa couplings are? They describe how strongly the different fermions couple to the Higgs field.

Edit: Note that they are not a charge in the sense of a charge related to a gauge symmetry.
 
  • #33
Orodruin said:
What do you think the Yukawa couplings are? They describe how strongly the different fermions couple to the Higgs field.

Edit: Note that they are not a charge in the sense of a charge related to a gauge symmetry.

that's what i am wondering about

a hypothesis that the reason second and third generation fermions are heavier than first and interact more strongly with the higgs field there is a higgs-charge that is a charge in the sense of a charge related to a gauge symmetry
 
  • #34
The coupling constants are these charges you are looking for. It doesn't matter if you call them coupling constants or charges. Same thing.
Orodruin said:
If there is no Higgs the Z is massless and does not decay (well, truth with modification). This is why I said cross sections instead of decays. A closer analogue would be the QCD color factors.
There would also be no physicists to perform experiments ;).
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #35
mfb said:
The coupling constants are these charges you are looking for. It doesn't matter if you call them coupling constants or charges. Same thing.There would also be no physicists to perform experiments ;).

isn't that another degree of freedom that all fermions and w and z bosons posses? a higgs-charge that determine yukawa interaction.

in a higgless universe, all particles then would be massless and travel at the speed of c is that correct? but they still have their charges so they could form something
 
  • #36
kodama said:
that's what i am wondering about

a hypothesis that the reason second and third generation fermions are heavier than first and interact more strongly with the higgs field there is a higgs-charge that is a charge in the sense of a charge related to a gauge symmetry

Yukava couplings are partially analogous to charges. The difference is that charges related to a gauge symmetry manifest themselves as a constant in the gauge covariant derivative's formula, and this constant is the same for all particles. For QED, the constant is the electron's charge.

Yukava couplings are constants too, but they are _different_ for every higgs-to-fermion coupling. No evidence so far exists that they are multiples of some fundamental, minimal "charge".

The reason for this difference is that coupling terms in Lagrangian for fermion-to-spin1-boson coupling and fermion-to-spin0-boson coupling have different forms.
 
  • Like
Likes kodama
  • #37
Orodruin said:
If there is no Higgs the Z is massless and does not decay (well, truth with modification).
I don't get that part, why wouldn't Z decay?
 
  • #38
ChrisVer said:
I don't get that part, why wouldn't Z decay?
How many massless particles do you know that decay?
 
  • #39
Orodruin said:
How many massless particles do you know that decay?
I know 1 massless particle out of the 1 massless particles there which can decay (well not alone)...
 
  • #40
ChrisVer said:
(well not alone)...
So, not a decay.
 
  • #41
This means that in a Higgsless universe you would not have 3 neutrino flavors also?
 
  • #42
You would still have three flavors. If you can distinguish between different neutrino types depends on the mechanism that leads to neutrino masses, but the different masses (if applicable) would be the only difference you could see.
 
  • #43
mfb said:
You would still have three flavors. If you can distinguish between different neutrino types depends on the mechanism that leads to neutrino masses, but the different masses (if applicable) would be the only difference you could see.
Many (not all, but I would say a majority of) neutrino mass models give rise to neutrino masses through the appearance of a Weinberg operator after integrating out some heavy states. Without the Higgs, such operators do not exist.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #44
in a higgless universe, what would happen if a tau interacts with a positron?
 
  • #45
kodama said:
in a higgless universe, what would happen if a tau interacts with a positron?
What happens in this universe (Higgsfull) when a tau interacts with a positron?
I don't know, is the Lepton number also associated with the existence of the Higgs?
 
  • Like
Likes kodama
  • #46
ChrisVer said:
What happens in this universe (Higgsfull) when a tau interacts with a positron?
I don't know, is the Lepton number also associated with the existence of the Higgs?

i was going to ask that to
 
  • Like
Likes arivero

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
792
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
9K