Is the Universe Expanding or Are Galaxies Just Moving Apart?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the universe's expansion versus the movement of galaxies apart. It clarifies that the term "expansion of the universe" refers to the increasing distances between galaxies, rather than the universe itself growing in size. Participants note that the Big Bang should not be visualized as an explosion from a central point, but rather as a uniform expansion of space. Additionally, it is suggested that the universe may have been spatially infinite even at the time of the Big Bang, despite common misconceptions. This understanding helps clarify the nature of cosmic expansion and its implications for the universe's structure.
gabrielh
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have a question about the expansion of the universe. First off, I'm only 16 and I don't have much knowledge of cosmology or astrophysics other than what I've read in a few books and on this site. That said, this question may be laughed at and it may have a basic answer, but I'll ask anyway.

I've always heard that the universe was expanding, but could it be that the universe itself isn't expanding, but the galaxies and such are just moving away from each other? I always seen galaxies moving away from each other not as the universe getting bigger, just what is in it is getting further apart.

I hope this isn't a stupid question. Thanks in advance.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi gabriel,

Your question is not stupid, and I think the root of the question lies in the definition of the expansion of the universe. This term is thrown around by almost everyone nowadays, especially popular science writers, but it was a term that originated as a "scientific shorthand" used by cosmologists. There are various different equivalent definitions for the expansion of the universe, but the one that I prefer to use is the one that features in your question: that is, the expansion of the universe is defined as the distances between all galaxies increasing. Thus, what you are thinking of is indeed what cosmologists talk about, and it is that which is translated into the "popular" expression "expansion of the universe."

I hope this helps!
 
Yes, this is the way I've always understood it, that it's something like the coordinate system of the universe that's expanding. I've also read somewhere that this ought to exert a force on atomic and molecular bonds, but is that something that has actually been demonstrated?

Another thing - it is frequently said that a common misunderstanding is that the Big Bang was like an explosion throwning mass away from a central point, to illustrate that it's really more like what gabrielh describes. Is a corollary to that that near the point of the Big Bang, say when everything was still the density of plasma, the universe may still have extended infinitely in every direction?

Many people I've talked to seem to think that at that point in time the universe was like a relatively small sphere in shape, perhaps due to the “Cosmic Egg” analogy to the Hindu creation myths. (Or maybe they're right and I'm wrong...)
 
Last edited:
Thank you guys for your help. It makes more sense to me now.
 
Yes Captain Quasar, It is possible (and the most likely possibility because measurements show that the Universe is probably spatially flat) that the Universe was spatially infinite when it was a hot dense uniform plasma. Our observable Universe now was most likely a very small patch of the plasma then, but the whole Universe would still be infinite.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top