Is the Universe Really Expanding or Are We Just Moving Faster?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the universe's expansion versus the idea that galaxies might be moving at different speeds in the same direction. One participant suggests that if our galaxy is moving faster than distant galaxies, it could create the illusion of expansion. However, others argue that General Relativity and Hubble's Law provide strong evidence for actual expansion, as distant galaxies consistently show redshift indicating they are moving away. The uniformity of this expansion in all directions further supports the prevailing theory. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of established scientific principles in understanding cosmic phenomena.
Tyah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why assume that the universe is expanding by observing that the space between our galaxy and distant galaxies is expanding. For example, what if our galaxy and distant galaxies are moving in the same direction, but our galaxy is moving faster than the distant galaxies we have observed. Resulting in the distance between to grow.

I have been thinking about this for some time. Please reply.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Okay. According to this theory, in one direction, we'll be, um, moving faster (I suggest you look into a layman's understanding of Special Relativity to understand why this has no meaning :wink: ), and the galaxies will appear to be moving away from us.

But in the other direction, according to your theory, shouldn't galaxies be slowly moving towards us on average?

General Relativity alone is enough evidence for the expansion of the Universe, the observation that faraway galaxies are moving away from us just supports the theory.
 
Tyah, welcome to the forum!

Like Whovian said, the expansion is uniform in all directions. This was discovered by Edwin Hubble, using the redshift of light from distant galaxies. When he took a measure of the redshift of this light, he discovered Hubble's Law - that there is a linear relationship between the distance to a galaxy, and the redshift of its light. This is implies that space is expanding - distant photons traverse larger amounts of expanding space.
 
thank you. Your replies have been very helpful
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top