Is there a func' for ideal x-section area in a resonant beam?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on longitudinal harmonic resonance, emphasizing the need for a tapering effect from fixed ends to mobile ends or from nodes to antinodes. It suggests that static instants at full compression or tension should yield a consistent percentage length change along the rod. A question is raised about whether velocity and acceleration at a point X from the node are proportional to X. The conversation also confirms the existence of a formula to calculate the rate of taper of the cross-sectional area based on material elastic modulus and frequency. The relevant formula mentioned is F = k/x, linking frequency, spring constant, and distance from the node.
silverslith
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Obviously it has to taper from the fixed end to the most mobile one. Or from the centre (node) of a symmetrical one to the ends (antinodes).

Talking about longatudinal harmonic resonance only here.

Ideally the static instants at full compression or tension would give a constant percentage length change from unloaded along the rod.

Does it follow that at any giventime, a point X distance from the node, has Velocity and acceleration: both proportional to X or am I confused?

I'm pretty sure this is an integration of shm mass/spring systems or somesuch.

Is there a formula that emerges for the rate of taper of the crossectional area for a given material elastic modulus and frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is a formula that can be used to calculate the rate of taper of the cross-sectional area based on the given material elastic modulus and frequency. The formula is F = k/x, where F is the frequency, k is the spring constant, and x is the distance from the node. This formula can be used to calculate the rate of taper of the cross-sectional area.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top