Is There a Limit to Turbulence in Fluid Dynamics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aero51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Turbulence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of turbulence in fluid dynamics, specifically whether there is a limit to how turbulent a flow can become. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical modeling challenges, and the relationship between turbulence and the Reynolds number.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if there is a limit to turbulence, suggesting that turbulence could become so chaotic that no discernible pattern can be identified.
  • Another participant argues against the notion of a limit, highlighting the difficulties in modeling turbulence and the challenges in measuring extreme chaos.
  • A different viewpoint states that theoretically, turbulence does not have a limit, noting that at very high Reynolds numbers, flows can re-laminarize, as observed in specific experimental setups like the Princeton Superpipe.
  • One participant mentions that turbulence can be characterized by energy cascades from large eddies to the Kolmogorov scale, complicating direct numerical simulations (DNS) due to the need for extremely fine mesh resolutions.
  • Another participant provides a perspective on the Reynolds number, indicating that while turbulence onset is often associated with a Reynolds number around 10,000, this is not universally applicable across different flow situations, such as airplane wings or automobiles, where the transition can occur at much higher values.
  • It is noted that the onset of turbulence is influenced by factors beyond the Reynolds number, including free-stream disturbances and surface characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of a limit to turbulence and the applicability of the Reynolds number in defining turbulence onset, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include the dependence on specific flow conditions and the challenges in accurately modeling turbulence at high Reynolds numbers, which may not be universally applicable across all scenarios.

Aero51
Messages
545
Reaction score
10
Just out of curiosity, is there a limit to how turbulent a flow can become? In otherwords, turbulence develop that is so chaotic that no discernible pattern/path can be found in the flow? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should there be a limit to "how turbulent a flow can become"? It is nearly impossible now to model simple turbulence even with powerful supercomputers, so how would we even measure extreme chaos?
 
In theory, no. In fact, at extremely higher Reynolds numbers, a flow can re-laminarize (e.g. the Princeton Superpipe).

Otherwise, in a normal situation, turbulence will always involve energy cascades from large flow-scale eddies all the way down to those of the Kolmogorov scale.

Therein lies the problem in performing a DNS of a full-scale turbulent flow. To accurately resolve the Kolmogorov scale in a given flow field, the mesh must be so fine that the problems often cannot be solved in an economically feasible length of time, even on supercomputers.
 
Aero51 said:
Just out of curiosity, is there a limit to how turbulent a flow can become? In otherwords, turbulence develop that is so chaotic that no discernible pattern/path can be found in the flow? Thanks.

Turbulence is like pornography- you know it when you see it. Often, laminar/turbulent flow can be parametrized by the Reynolds number, with turbulent flow indicated around a Reynolds number Re ~ 10000. At the low end, the onset of turbulence, there appears to be a fairly well-defined transition region. However, AFAIK, there does not appear to be anything fundamentally new regardless of how large the Reynolds number is: Russel Donnelly's group has done a lot of work generating flow regimes as high as Re ~ 10^7- 10^9, and IIRC stellar interiors can reach Re ~ 10^12.
 
FWIW, turbulence onset as a function of Reynolds number is only well-defined for pipe flow and perhaps a tiny handful of others. I don't know where 10000 was found, but for things such as airplane wings or automobiles (in the absence of separation), the transition Reynolds number is often much, much higher; well over [itex]10^6[/itex]. The problem is that the onset o turbulence is dependent on more than just the Reynolds number, notably the free-stream disturbances (sound, turbulence, temperature), surface temperature and surface roughness.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
473
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K