Engineering Is There a Missing Load in My Statically Indeterminate Shaft Calculation?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the bending moments and reaction forces for a statically indeterminate shaft in a gearbox design. The user has successfully calculated the top shaft's moments and reaction forces but is struggling with the bottom shaft, yielding a moment of only 2.98 Nm, which seems implausible given the applied torque of 107.8 Nm. There is concern about the disproportionate load on the needle bearing, which is calculated at 1700 N, and whether a second load or a uniform distributed load (UDL) should be considered in the analysis. The conversation suggests that the current load model may be incorrect and introduces the "unit load" method as a potential solution to clarify the loading conditions. Overall, the user seeks guidance on ensuring accurate calculations for the shaft's loading and moments.
yonese
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I'm trying to solve for this intederminate beam for an output shaft for a gearbox I'm designing. I have 3 bearings (1 deep groove, 1 needle and 1 cylindrical) and I have assumed that axial load is negligible.
Relevant Equations
P = A+B+C
I have drawn the bending moment diagram to try to help me determine the moment, but I am certain my values are wrong. I have included a picture of my gearbox design, where the bottom shaft is what I'm trying to calculate. I've been able to calculate the top shaft moments and reaction forces with no problem. (Bending moment = 30.63 Nm, ball bearing = 850.8 N, roller bearing = 928.2N, Torque = 55.2 Nm)
Screen Shot 2021-05-24 at 18.10.19.png

Screen Shot 2021-05-24 at 18.11.27.png

For the bottom shaft, I am given that the torque is 107.8 Nm and I managed to get moment = 2.98 Nm, which just doesn't seem likely. My calculated reaction forces for the bearings are
Ball = 17 N
Needle = 1700 N
Roller = 98 N

It doesn't seem likely that the needle bearing would take so much of the load, considering the magnitude of my previous answers.

Is there a second load that I am missing? Or prehaps I should be taking the shaft and gear as a UDL?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not into gears and such, but your load diagram shows the concentrated load of 1779 N practically right on top of the needle support B, implying B will take most all of the up reaction load, with small down reaction at A, and small up reaction at C, and there will be very little bending moment in the shaft, so your analysis is correct for the loading shown. But whether your load model is correct is another story.
 
Are you familiar with the "unit load" method? If so, that will resolve this problem rather quickly.
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K