I Is there a mistake in the second equation of (5.139)?

Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
I believe there is a mistake in the second equation of (5.139).

Screen Shot 2016-08-05 at 2.39.45 am.png


The equation is obtained from (5.138) using the Euler-Lagrange equation
##\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{\theta}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial\theta}.##

LHS##\,\,=\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{\theta}}=\frac{d}{dt}(mr^2\dot{\theta}-mr\dot{x}\cos\theta)##
##=mr^2\ddot{\theta}-mr\dot{x}(-\sin\theta)\dot{\theta}-mr\ddot{x}\cos\theta\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,## (Note that ##\dot{r}## terms are ignored.)

RHS##\,\,=mgr\sin\theta##

Equating LHS and RHS, and dividing by ##m## and ##r##, we have
##r\ddot{\theta}+\dot{x}\sin\theta\dot{\theta}-\ddot{x}\cos\theta=g\sin\theta##.

Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a ##\theta##-dependent term that you have forgotten to differentiate inside the parentheses.
 
  • Like
Likes Happiness
Back
Top