Is there a new solution for Cardano's formula?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter edgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation Roots Unity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around potential connections between the roots of unity, specifically the cube roots and seventh roots, and their implications for Cardano's formula and cubic equations. Participants explore mathematical relationships, definitions, and the possibility of new solutions or approaches related to these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the connection between the cube roots and seventh roots of unity, noting their common magnitude of 1.
  • One participant suggests that the connection can be expressed through the identity x³ = y⁷, where x is the cube root of 1 and y is the seventh root of 1.
  • Another participant emphasizes the complexity of discussing Cardano's formula and expresses a desire for dialogue on new ideas related to cubic equations.
  • Some participants mention that all real roots of unity are equal to 1, while acknowledging the existence of complex roots.
  • One participant presents a detailed mathematical framework involving cyclic equations and their relationships, proposing that these may lead to an alternative solution for Cardano's formula.
  • There is a request for peer review on the proposed ideas, indicating a need for feedback from the forum community.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of connections between the roots of unity and their implications for Cardano's formula. There is no consensus on the validity or implications of the proposed ideas, and the discussion remains open-ended.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex mathematical concepts and relationships that may not be fully resolved. Some participants express uncertainty about definitions and the depth of explanation required for clarity.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the mathematical properties of roots of unity, cubic equations, and alternative approaches to established formulas may find this discussion relevant.

edgo
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Just asking: is it likely that there is any connection between roots as
[tex]\sqrt[3]{1}[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt[7]{1}[/tex]?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
edgo said:
Just asking: is it likely that there is any connection between roots as
[tex]\sqrt[3]{1}[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt[7]{1}[/tex]?
Hmm, let's see:
Regarding the radix operations as functions from the reals to reals, i'd say the connection consists of an identity between your two expressions..
 
What exactly do you mean by a connection? They all (that is, the 3rd and 7th roots of unity) have a magnitude of 1 but I can't think of anything else.
 
If x= cuberoot of 1 then x3= 1.
If y= seventhroot of 1 then y7= 1.

Thus x3= y7. That's the "connection".
 
Thank you for the answers. The last one is the best one and I was that far myself. Only: the shoe doesn't fit. I don't want to be a headache with my eternal questions about cube roots but the truth is that I do have a bloody good reason to be superstitious about the combination Cardano/Galois/solutions of cubic equations. The problem is that it takes about 5 pages A4 loaded with formulas to get to the point where we can do business, so to say. And I am not familiar with the math. jargon in English, a jargon that tends to be very helpfull if one wants to explain new ideas. At the moment I am a member of a Dutch forum and have been busy to load their site with rather a lot formulas in LaTeX. We are now at the point where it can become a dialogue. May be you will never hear of me again, an indication that I was wrong. But if they don't can falsificate my theory then I am sure back here. I don't mean to say that this forum is my second choice, only native speech in math is my first choice, when it is new stuff. By the way, thanks for your immortal answer the other day that te solution of cubic equations is only: cube root (stuff) + cube root (other stuff). American eloquence.
 
All real roots of unity are the same (i.e. 1). There are other roots of unity though, namely the complex ones :)
 
-1, workmad3?
 
oh yeah, there's that one too for some. Kinda forgotten that -1 was real for a second :) (or more likely forgotten that it was a root of unity... which is just as embarrassing)

They do all have a magnitude of 1 and lie on the unit circle in the complex plane though and some of the roots are shared (square roots are 1 and -1, while 4th roots are 1, -1, i and -i so have 2 roots in common).

Of course, that's assuming that you aren't defining the root operation as only the positive real roots of unity in which case they are all the same and equal to 1 (but that's a fairly limiting view and derives directly from the fact that 1 is a multiplicative identity number for the reals)
 
OK it's some time ago, but...
The connection I was referring to concerns the following. For the solutions of the equations [tex]x^7=1[/tex] and [tex]y^9=1[/tex] we can form the systems:
[tex]X_1=x+\frac{1}{x}[/tex]
[tex]X_2=x^2+\frac{1}{x^2}[/tex]
[tex]X_3=x^4+\frac{1}{x^4}[/tex]
[tex]X_1=x^8+\frac{1}{x^8}=x+\frac{1}{x}[/tex]
and
[tex]Y_1=y+\frac{1}{y}[/tex]
[tex]Y_2=y^2+\frac{1}{y^2}[/tex]
[tex]Y_3=y^4+\frac{1}{y^4}[/tex]
[tex]Y_1=y^8+\frac{1}{y^8}=\frac{1}{y}+y[/tex].

We can form the equations [tex]X^3+X^2-2X-1=0[/tex] and [tex]Y^3-3Y+1=0[/tex]; the solutions of these equations satisfy the relation of the form [tex]Z_i^2-p=Z_j[/tex] with, in this case, p=2.
For any p we can always form 2 equations of which the solutions satisfy such a relation. I have named them cyclic equations with the cyclic constant p.
When 2 cyclic equations have the same constant, there always is a lot of isomorphy between the roots of those conjugated cyclic equations. I expect this to hold for the above mentioned solutions too. It would be helpful to get some input which is not originating from my work.

My question is: is this Forum open for a topic on a subject that takes about one full Forum-page to explain. It's all math, it's all proven (but the proofs are not included as to keep it short) and it's concerning what I believe to be the proof for the existence of an alternative solution for Cardano. I am looking for a kind of peer review. I didn't succeed in Holland due to a lack of time by the moderators
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K