Is there a problem with this Source Transformation?

  • #1
2
0
ssadas.jpg

Hey guys, i did this source transformation as an alternate method to find the transfer function of a circuit, however I am getting a different transfer function of 2/(2s+(s+3)(s^2+1)) to the solution in the following image. Any help would be really appreciated :)
solution2.JPG
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,072
Hi danie9! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif [Broken]

Your analysis using the first method looks right.

The mistake you're making in the second is that while representing the first stage by its Thévenin voltage source you are forgetting about its Thévenin impedance. The result is as though there exists a unity gain buffer amplifier between the two stages because you are, in effect, assuming/using a Thévenin impedance of zero ohms. But there is no such isolating amplifier. So as well as redrawing with a voltage source you need to include the impedance of that voltage source to properly account for the loading effect of stage II on stage I.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Danie9
  • #3
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,072
To avoid the likelihood of sooner or later mistaking your lower-case "s" for the numeral "5" somewhere in the middle of many pages of complex algebra, consider adopting a cursive lower-case letter "s" for your electronics work. Writing it like this will obviate one glaring opportunity for going astray in your work. (Leave off the lower-right upward flourish, that stem is needed only when joining to a following alphabet letter.)

http://www.kbteachers.com/alphabet/cursive/lowercase-s.gif [Broken] ;);)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Danie9
  • #4
2
0
Hi danie9! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif [Broken]

Your analysis using the first method looks right.

The mistake you're making in the second is that while representing the first stage by its Thévenin voltage source you are forgetting about its Thévenin impedance. The result is as though there exists a unity gain buffer amplifier between the two stages because you are, in effect, assuming/using a Thévenin impedance of zero ohms. But there is no such isolating amplifier. So as well as redrawing with a voltage source you need to include the impedance of that voltage source to properly account for the loading effect of stage II on stage I.
Yes thank you so much, i will definitely start using a cursive 's' :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads on Is there a problem with this Source Transformation?

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
805
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
758
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
817
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
11K
Top