Is There a Proof for Congruent Segments on Any Transversal with Parallel Lines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter susanasarandon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Specific
susanasarandon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Our professor has challened us to find the proof for the following theorem:

If three parallel lines intercept congruant segments on one transversal, then they intercept congruant segments on any transversal.

He says it's not anywhere he's read. Help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'll prove the theorem for you,

For any three parallel lines cut by a transversal, where AB = BC,
then another transversal will cut the parallel lines in the same ratio.

IF AB = BC, then DE = EF

I hope that's sufficient proof, i would of liked to shown a diagram, however, I'm limited by the medium I'm using.


AEK
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top