B Is there a relationship between the harmonic mean and the standard deviation?

Feynstein100
Messages
181
Reaction score
17
I was doing a thought experiment on the harmonic mean. Let's say we have a sequence of 4 numbers:

100, 110, 90, 100

The arithmetic mean (AM) of this sequence is 100 but the harmonic mean (HM) is 99.4975.
Let's imagine that the initial and final values remain constant but the middle ones get more and more extreme.

100, 120, 80, 100

The AM is still 100 but the HM is now 97.9592

100, 130, 70, 100

AM = 100, HM = 95.2880

and so on

I think I understand why this happens. The AM is symmetric, if you will. So an equal movement above the mean will cancel out an equal movement below it. However, the HM is more skewed toward the lowest value in the sequence. As such, it only takes one low value to bring the HM down. And with each step, we have a lower minimum and thus a lower HM. This is basically a crude verbal proof. Is there a more rigorous, mathematical one?

I'm also interested to know if there's a relationship between the HM and the fluctuation (I guess the arithmetic standard deviation is a good way to represent this). I mean, there has to be, as higher fluctuations mean higher likelihood of lower values and thus a lower HM, right?

Basically, HM = f(σ)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Imagine a variable x with a distribution N(μ,σ2), i.e. a Normal distribution with mean μ and variance σ2. Think of x as μ + δ where δ = N(0,σ2), and (for simplicity) σ << μ. Can you derive an (approximate) expression for HM, where HM = 1/E(1/x)?
 
mjc123 said:
Imagine a variable x with a distribution N(μ,σ2), i.e. a Normal distribution with mean μ and variance σ2. Think of x as μ + δ where δ = N(0,σ2), and (for simplicity) σ << μ. Can you derive an (approximate) expression for HM, where HM = 1/E(1/x)?
Sounds interesting. But what exactly is E in this case? 😅
 
The expectation (mean of the distribution).
 
mjc123 said:
The expectation (mean of the distribution).
Ah okay but isn't that literally the definition of the harmonic mean? Not sure what we'd get by proving it. I mean, I'm trying to find a relationship between HM and σ, not HM and E.

Also, in the example, the E remained constant whereas the HM kept decreasing, exactly illustrating my point. Although, oh wait. That was the AM, not E(1/x). My bad 😅
 
I wasn't asking you to prove HM = 1/E(1/x), but to use that definition to derive an expression for HM in terms of μ and σ.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top