Is There a Simpler Way to Find the nth Differential Coefficient?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to find the nth differential coefficient of the expression \(\frac{x^2}{(x-a)(x-b)}\). The problem involves calculus, specifically the differentiation of rational functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of partial fractions to simplify the expression before differentiation. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks a simpler method. Others suggest starting with polynomial long division before applying partial fractions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods of simplification. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of polynomial long division and the structure of partial fractions, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of partial fractions and the complexity of the resulting expressions after differentiation. The original poster is looking for a more elegant solution, suggesting a desire for clarity in the problem setup.

chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Im supposed to find the nth differential coeff. of [tex]\frac{x^2}{(x-a)(x-b)}[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using partial fractions, I simplified it to:

[tex]\frac{x^2}{(b-a)}(\frac{1}{x-a}-\frac{1}{x-b})[/tex]

To simplify matters, I assumed [tex]t=\frac{1}{x-a}-\frac{1}{x-b}[/tex].

This expression now becomes [tex]\frac{1}{b-a}x^2t[/tex].

Differentiating wrt x , [tex]\frac{1}{b-a}(2xt+x^2\frac{dt}{dx})[/tex]

I did this two more times, and it seems to be something like this:

[tex]\frac{d^ny}{dx^n}=\frac{1}{b-a}(2nx\frac{d^{n-2}t}{dx^{n-2}}+2nx\frac{d^{n-1}t}{dx^{n-1}}+x^2\frac{d^nt}{dx^n}[/tex]

Now, since [tex]t=\frac{1}{x-a}-\frac{1}{x-b}[/tex], similarly,

[tex]\frac{d^nt}{dx^n}=(-1)^nn!(\frac{1}{(x-a)^{-(n+1)}}-\frac{1}{(x-b)^{-(n+1)}})[/tex]

Substituting this in the above equation, I get another expression which is quite messed up. So far, is what I've done right? And is there another simpler way to do this? It seems to me that I've missed something somewhere which would make this problem a lot simpler, but I just can't find it. I don't think brute force is the only way to do this, and a push in the right direction would really be very welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The partial fraction stuff isn't going well. First divide x^2 by the denominator. That will give you 1+(Ax+B)/((x-a)*(x-b)). Find A and B. Now with a little work you can find constants C and D so that this becomes 1+C/(x-a)+D/(x-b). Now THAT'S partial fractions.
 
Dick said:
The partial fraction stuff isn't going well. First divide x^2 by the denominator. That will give you 1+(Ax+B)/((x-a)*(x-b)). Find A and B. Now with a little work you can find constants C and D so that this becomes 1+C/(x-a)+D/(x-b). Now THAT'S partial fractions.

I don't get it. What did I do wrong? What I did pans out. I was just hoping there was a more elegant solution to the problem.
 
One thing I was thinking of was taking x to be a complex number of the form [tex]x=cos\theta + isin\theta[/tex], and then assuming [tex]cos\theta -a = rcos\phi[/tex] and [tex]sin\theta =rsin\phi[/tex] and going on from there if the current situation is an incomplete solution. Any insights would be highly appreciated.
 
chaoseverlasting said:
I don't get it. What did I do wrong? What I did pans out. I was just hoping there was a more elegant solution to the problem.

You didn't do anything wrong - you just didn't 'partial fraction' as much as you could. You still have an expression that gets overly complicated as you take more and more derivatives. As I said, you could reduce the expression to something of the form A+B/(x-a)+C/(x-b) which is manageable.
 
Dick said:
You didn't do anything wrong - you just didn't 'partial fraction' as much as you could. You still have an expression that gets overly complicated as you take more and more derivatives. As I said, you could reduce the expression to something of the form A+B/(x-a)+C/(x-b) which is manageable.

Ok. Ill try that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K