Alex299792458
- 38
- 3
Is there a solid that has a density of or below the density of air or any gas?
The discussion centers around the question of whether there exists a solid material with a density equal to or lower than that of air or any gas. Participants explore various materials and concepts related to density, buoyancy, and the definitions of solids.
Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on whether materials like aerogels or helium-filled structures can be classified as solids. The discussion remains unresolved, with competing perspectives on the definitions and properties of solids in relation to density and buoyancy.
The discussion includes various assumptions about the definitions of solids and the conditions under which materials can be classified as such. There are also unresolved questions regarding the criteria for density and buoyancy in different contexts.
Not quite what you asked, but still fun:Alex299792458 said:Is there a solid that has a density of or below the density of air or any gas?
Alex299792458 said:Is there a solid that has a density of or below the density of air or any gas?
One could also try a lighter than air gas for the filling.rootone said:Light elements are obviously the best candidates, Carbon is I think one of them.
Alex299792458 said:Is there a solid that has a density of or below the density of air or any gas?
But that is not mylar, it is mylar + helium. And the lower-than-air-density is due to the presence of the helium, a gas.nasu said:But this is not a "solid". Not more so than would be any vacuumed box. This may answer the OP need. Unfortunately he did not specify the goal besides "floating in the air".
A mylar balloon filled with helium may fit the description too. Mylar is pretty "solid".
An evacuated hollow sphere manufactured from lead is more stylish.nasu said:But this is not a "solid". Not more so than would be any vacuumed box. This may answer the OP need. Unfortunately he did not specify the goal besides "floating in the air".
A mylar balloon filled with helium may fit the description too. Mylar is pretty "solid".
Agreed. At this point, the discussion seems largely a question of semantics. Do we consider a solid plus its enclosed lighter-than-the-surrounding-gas gas (or vacuum, if the solid part is strong enough not to collapse) to be a solid object?nasu said:Yes. And the same can be said about these "aerogels".
My point was that IF these are considered to fit the description, we can have simpler solutions.
anorlunda said:Hmm how about an H2O molecule? It seems to fit the following Wikipedia definition of a solid.
What do we call the state of matter when there are too few molecules to classify as solid/liquid/gas ?
Vanadium 50 said:Do you consider a box of helium a solid? If so, there's your answer. If not, a helium filled aerogel isn't either, since it's essentially a number of such "boxes" that are attached to each other.
Redbelly98 said:Agreed. At this point, the discussion seems largely a question of semantics. Do we consider a solid plus its enclosed lighter-than-the-surrounding-gas gas (or vacuum, if the solid part is strong enough not to collapse) to be a solid object?
In my opinion, it doesn't.