Is there a way of measuring reflectance vs absorbance

AI Thread Summary
Measuring the shielding effectiveness of materials against electromagnetic waves can be approached qualitatively and quantitatively using a power meter sensitive to the specific EM wave range. For effective testing, an enclosure is recommended, allowing for measurements with and without the material in place. A self-powered measuring receiver inside the enclosure can enhance accuracy by minimizing external signal interference. Measuring reflectance is more complex due to the need to account for various reflection angles, including specular and diffuse reflections. The specific wavelength of the electromagnetic waves is crucial for determining the appropriate measurement techniques.
PolyOneTechie
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am looking at EMI Shielding effectiveness testing and I would like to measure how a material is shielding Electromagnetic waves, qualitatively. Is there a way to measure how a material is shielding qualitatively and quantitatively (in dB)?
 
Science news on Phys.org
PolyOneTechie said:
I am looking at EMI Shielding effectiveness testing and I would like to measure how a material is shielding Electromagnetic waves, qualitatively. Is there a way to measure how a material is shielding qualitatively and quantitatively (in dB)?

Er... hum. Get a power meter sensitive to the range of EM wave that you're interested in, and put it on the other side of the EM source and measure?

Zz.
 
What is the form of this "shielding"? For good shielding, you need an enclosure, which makes it relatively easy to test - by putting a measuring receiver inside (self powered, preferably, to reduce the number of ways the unwanted signal can get in) and measuring with and without the box. Alternatively, you can put a (self-powered) source in the box.
Measuring the reflectance is much harder because you may need to look in all directions as there may be specular or diffuse reflection.
This all depends upon the sort of wavelength you're dealing with, of course. Give us a clue?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top