Is there a way to differentiate between numbers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epsi00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate Numbers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of differentiating between numbers based on their factorization properties, specifically focusing on numbers that can be expressed in the form of products with specific last digits. Participants explore whether there exists a method to identify whether a number is a product of factors ending in certain digits without actually factoring the number.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the idea of two sets of numbers, A and B, defined by their last digits and their forms, seeking a method to classify numbers without factoring.
  • Another participant clarifies that both sets consist of numbers of the form 6*k+1, and discusses how multiplication within these sets yields periodic last two digits, complicating the differentiation based solely on those digits.
  • Examples are provided to illustrate the multiplication of numbers from these sets and their resulting last two digits, emphasizing the challenge of distinguishing between products of the forms 3*1 and 7*9.
  • Concerns are raised about cases where numbers can be expressed as products of different pairs, leading to the same result, which complicates the differentiation further.
  • There is a repeated emphasis on the need for a test that can reliably differentiate between the two types of products without factoring, despite acknowledging that some cases may yield the same numerical result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of developing a test to differentiate between the two types of products without factoring. While some agree on the complexity of the problem, there is no consensus on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the proposed methods, including the dependence on specific forms of numbers and the potential for multiple representations leading to the same product, which complicates the differentiation process.

epsi00
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
like N=5053=163*31 and N=169*37=6253 if we do not know the factors and if we do not want to factor them. They both have the same last two digits.
I can't think of any test to apply to this kind of numbers ( it's in fact a family of numbers that share the same last two digits but are product of (last digit only ) 3*1 or 7*9 ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's what I understand from your post. You have two disjoint sets of numbers, A and B. You want a method to determine whether a number is a member of set A or set B under the assumption that it is in one of those, without factoring the number.

If that's right, would you define A and B more precisely?
 
CRGreathouse said:
Here's what I understand from your post. You have two disjoint sets of numbers, A and B. You want a method to determine whether a number is a member of set A or set B under the assumption that it is in one of those, without factoring the number.

If that's right, would you define A and B more precisely?

That's correct. A and B both are of the form 6*k+1. and multiplication ( within each set ) of two numbers ( whose last digits can be a 3*1 or a 7*9) (from the two different sets) always produces two numbers with the last two digits ( not necessarily 53 and not necessarily the same) 13 or 33 or 93 or 73).

example:
163*31 = 5053 a number produced by a 3*1 multiplication ( last digits only )
169*37 = 6253 a number produced by a 9*7 multiplication ( last digits only )

another example would be:
133*61 = 8113
139*67 = 9313

but also
103*31 = 3193
109*37 = 4033

I am interested in finding out a test by which, given a number, we can say it's a "3*1" product or a 7*9 ( without having to factor the number ).

thanks
 
What if you can't? 2673 = 81*33 = 27*99
 
hamster143 said:
What if you can't? 2673 = 81*33 = 27*99


your number is not a product of a 6k+1 by another 6k+1. Those numbers obey different rules.
I am only interested in numbers of the form 6*k+1.

multiplication of numbers of the form (6j+1)(6i+1) have periodic "last two digits" like I wrote in my earlier post. So just looking at the last two digits of a number will not tell us if that number was a product of a 3*1 or a 7*9 because these two products produce the same last two digits ( 13, 99, 73 and 53 ). Here 3*1 and 7*9 refer only to the last digit of the factors making up a number. ( 163*31 is a 3*1 product ).
 
epsi00 said:
your number is not a product of a 6k+1 by another 6k+1. Those numbers obey different rules.
I am only interested in numbers of the form 6*k+1.

Okay then, 31*343 =(6*5+1)*(6*57+1) = 49*217 = (6*8+1)*(6*36+1) = 10633.
 
hamster143 said:
Okay then, 31*343 =(6*5+1)*(6*57+1) = 49*217 = (6*8+1)*(6*36+1) = 10633.

true again but so what? I am talking about the general case where the 3*1 number is not of the same value as a 7*9. I consider pairs of numbers, one of each kind.
to 31*343 can be associated 37*349 and I don't think these two are the same.
to 49*217 can be associated 43*211 and I again don't think that they have the same value.

the original question was about a test to tell the difference between a 3*1 and 7*9 number without having to factor them. In some cases the value is the same and my question loses its meaning but like I said I am talking about pairs such that:

N = p*q = a 3*1 number
M = (p+6)*(q+6) = a 7*9 number.

and all the examples I gave are of pairs ( in one of my previous posts )

so is there a test to tell the difference between the two.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K