Is there an easy way to calculate this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goonking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bouncy ball dropped from a height of 28.7 meters, which loses 9% of its kinetic energy with each bounce. The objective is to determine how many times the ball can bounce while still achieving a maximum height greater than half the original height of the drop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the heights after consecutive bounces and question how to express this mathematically. There are attempts to derive a formula for the height after each bounce and to understand the implications of energy loss on the height achieved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the sequence of heights and the mathematical relationships involved, while others are exploring the logarithmic expressions needed to solve for the maximum number of bounces. There is an ongoing dialogue about the correct interpretation of the energy loss and its effect on the height of the bounces.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of the energy loss percentage and how it translates into height reduction. There are also references to logarithmic properties that are being clarified, indicating some uncertainty in the mathematical approach.

goonking
Messages
434
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A Bouncy ball is dropped from a window, 28.7 meters above the ground. It bounces inelastically off the ground and bounces up again, but not as high as it stated out. If it looses 9 percent of its kinetic energy every time it hits the ground, how many times can it bounce, and still have a maximum height greater than half the original window height.

Homework Equations


1/2 mv^2 = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


Since I know it loses 9% of its kinetic energy, the potential will be lowered by 9% each time the ball bounces also.

So I did 28.7 - (0.09 x 28.7) = 26.1

then 26.1 - (0.09 x 2.61) = 23.76

then 23.76 - (0.09 x 23.76) = 21.627

and so on, I keep repeating this until I get an answer below 28.7 / 2 = 14.35 meters.

And after all that, I get the answer to be 7 bounces.Is there a faster way to do this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is, how many times can it bounce, and still have a maximum height greater than half the original window height.
The seventh bounce produces less height than half the initial. Count the bounces till the height is still greater than half the initial height, but the next bounce produces less than the half.
What is the relation between the k-th height and the k+1 height? What sequence do the heights make?
 
ehild said:
The question is, how many times can it bounce, and still have a maximum height greater than half the original window height.
Count the bounces till the height is still greater than half the initial height, but the next bounce produce less than the half.
What is the relation between the k-th height and the k+1 height? What sequence do the heights make?
what is k-th and k+1?
 
k represents the k-th bounce. It is just a positive integer. For example, the height after the third bounce is 0.91 times the height after the second bounce.
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
k represents the k-th bounce. It is just a positive integer. For example, the height after the third bounce is 0.9 times the height after the second bounce.
the previous bounce is always 1.01 times higher.

28.7/26.11 = 1.01

26.11/23.76= 1.01

23.76/21.62 = 1.01
etc etc

so I can just keep dividing by 1.01 to get a new height.
 
Why do you divide by 1.01? If the energy loss is 9 percent it means that the energy after the next bounce is 0.91 times the previous one. Dividing by 1.01 produces 0.99 times the previous one, which is 1 percent loss.

The next bounce is 0.91 times the previous one. Considering the heights as a sequence h0, h1, h2... hk what is the relation between one term and the next one? What kind of sequence is it?
 
ehild said:
Why do you divide by 1.01? If the energy loss is 9 percent it means that the energy after the next bounce is 0.91 times the previous one. Dividing by 1.01 produces 0.99 times the previous one, which is 1 percent loss.

The next bounce is 0.91 times the previous one. Considering the heights as a sequence h0, h1, h2... hk what is the relation between one term and the next one? What kind of sequence is it?
oh, I am sorry, I meant 1.1, not 1.01.
 
Instead of dividing, use multiplication. Loosing 9 % means that 91% remains. Dividing by 1.1 means that 90.90909...% remains.They are not the same.
So how do you get the height after the first bounce from the initial height? How do you get the height after the second bounce?
 
ehild said:
Instead of dividing, use multiplication. Loosing 9 % means that 91% remains. Dividing by 1.1 means that 90.90909...% remains.They are not the same.
So how do you get the height after the first bounce from the initial height? How do you get the height after the second bounce?
first height times 0.91 gives new height , then we just keep repeating?
 
  • #10
Keeps repeating. How many times is the second height of the initial height? How many times is the third height of the initial height? How many times is the k-th height of the initial height?
 
  • #11
ah
ehild said:
Keeps repeating. How many times is the second height of the initial height? How many times is the third height of the initial height? How many times is the k-th height of the initial height?
the first bounce is 0.91 times the initial height, and the 2nd bounce is 0.82 times the initial , and the 3rd bounce is .73 the initial.

I'm assuming k-th is the height we want it at, which is 14.35 which is .5 times the initial.
 
  • #12
goonking said:
ah

the first bounce is 0.91 times the initial height, and the 2nd bounce is 0.82 times the initial , and the 3rd bounce is .73 the initial.

How is it symbolically? If the initial height is H the first is
h1= H*0.91,
the second is
h2=H*0.91*0.91=H*0.912,
the third is
h3=H*0.913,
the k-th is
hk=H*0.91k.

So you have the relation

hk ≥ 0.5 .

What is the maximum value of k so as the inequality is valid? How do you express k with logarithm?
 
  • #13
ehild said:
logarithm
log(14.35)/log(28.7) = .7935

is that it?
 
  • #14
No. Take the logarithm of both sides what do you get?
 
  • #15
ehild said:
No. Take the logarithm of both sides what do you get?
you mean log h^k ≥ log 0.5

?
 
  • #16
Yes. Do you know how to take the logarithm of something on the k-th power?
 
  • #17
ehild said:
Yes. Do you know how to take the logarithm of something on the k-th power?
Sadly, no. I will just look it up.
 
  • #18
Haven't you studied logarithm yet?
 
  • #19
ehild said:
Haven't you studied logarithm yet?
yes, but it was a while ago and somethings have been forgotten
 
  • #20
log(a b) = log (a) +log(b)
log(a/b) = log (a)-log (b)

log (ak) = k log(a) ... :smile:
 
  • #21
ehild said:
log(a b) = log (a) +log(b)
log(a/b) = log (a)-log (b)

log (ak) = k log(a) ... :smile:
what do the eclipses mean?
 
  • #22
you mean the dt
goonking said:
what do the eclipses mean?
you mean the dots? They mean only that there are some more identities.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K