Is there an ultimate goal to mathematics progress?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics
AI Thread Summary
Mathematicians face ongoing challenges similar to those in physics, with no clear endpoint to their inquiries. The fundamental questions in mathematics were largely addressed 80 years ago, notably by Hilbert and Godel, revealing that complete axiomatization is impossible. Despite this, modern mathematicians often overlook these historical insights, focusing instead on practical applications. The discussion draws parallels between the Higgs boson and mathematical inquiries, suggesting that while both are fundamental, they hold little relevance for most practitioners in their respective fields. Ultimately, the pursuit of knowledge in mathematics, like in physics, remains an evolving journey rather than a destination.
Newai
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Just as physicists are trying to answer their most fundamental questions with the LHC, are mathematicians in a similar bind? Is there a foreseeable time when they will no longer be faced with daunting mysteries?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Newai said:
Just as physicists are trying to answer their most fundamental questions with the LHC, are mathematicians in a similar bind? Is there a foreseeable time when they will no longer be faced with daunting mysteries?

The world isn't a mystery to solve. The search for the Higgs boson makes a pretty headline, but it won't be the end of science. Think of it like chess or football or whatever game you like. The rules are simple. The game is not.

The most fundamental questions of mathematics were resolved 80 years ago. In 1900, Hilbert wanted all of mathematical logic completely axiomatized in a consistent way. In 1931, we found it wasn't possible thanks to Godel. With the invention of computer science, we discovered that all of mathematics can be boiled down to a search algorithm and "solved" essentially the same way Big Blue plays chess. The caveat: to do anything as useful as that sentence sounds would take more resources than a billion universes would be able to provide.

The funny thing is that most modern mathematicians don't care or are even totally unaware of Hilbert and Godel. Godel's work isn't considered significant in the realm of mathematics (it is more important in logic and philosophy), and the reason is that it isn't really applicable to what everyone does.

That sounds a lot like the Higgs boson to me. Yeah, it's the truth. It's fundamental. But it's also totally useless to 99.99% of people in physics. Food chemists will still churn out new products to turn kids' mouths green. Bioengineers will work on new ways to use bacteria to process goods. And all of the material scientists and electrical engineers will continue to pretend that nothing is smaller than the electron.
 
Wow. That's a lot for me to think about, given the perspective I've had for many years. Thanks!
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Does Infinity Times Two Equal Infinity and Other Mathematical Paradoxes?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B The Paradox of 1 – 1 + 1 – 1 + 1 – 1 + …
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Pure mathematics problem solving and relevance to theoretical physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Visualisation in math and physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Shinichi Mochizuki's ABC Conjecture and Replication Crisis in Maths
Replies
33
Views
7K
Keeping uncertainty at arm's length
Replies
2
Views
2K
I'm looking for someone to talk to about mathematical physics
Replies
1
Views
641
A PDE: Between Physics and Mathematics
Replies
6
Views
4K
W. P. Thurston, "How do mathematicians advance understanding of math?"
Replies
3
Views
3K
What are the Real-World Applications of Different Fields in Mathematics?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top