Is there any known theorem about this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JK423
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
JK423
Gold Member
Messages
394
Reaction score
7
Suppose that you have a probability distribution P of a parameter which, for simplicity, it is two-valued. For example, it could be a coin where we denote heads with "+" and tails with "-". Suppose that we throw the coin N times, and the results tend to follow the probability ditribution P for large enough N (which naturally could be 50%-50%).
We then calculate the mean value of all these results, which are a series of "+" and "-" (N in total), and find a number <S>.
Suppose now, that, we erase M of these results (with M<N) from the total N, and we are left with the rest N-M results. BUT, we do the erasure with a completely random way. We calculate, again, the mean value with the N-M results, <S'>.

QUESTION
Will the mean values <S> and <S'> be equal?

The answer will surely depend on the numbers N, M. Is there any known theorem about this, that guarantees the equality for appropriate N, M?

Edit: For finite N, M ofcourse the equality is impossible. What i mean is whether <S'> can approach <S> very very close, for appropriate N, M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your question about the sample mean or the theoretical mean? For the sample means, they could be different. For the theoretical means, they are equal.
 
Hmm, what is the difference? Perhaps, you mean that the sample mean includes a finite N while the theoretical an infinite N?

I am looking for a theorem on sample mean with finite N, so that it's applicable in real applications..
I am glad that the theoretical means are equal though :). Is there any proof of this to your knowledge?
 
The theoretical mean is determined from the probability distribution. It has nothing to do with sample size. There is a theorem (law of large numbers) which states (under the proper conditions) that the sample mean -> theoretical mean as N becomes infinite.

I don't know what kind of theorem you are looking for. Perhaps the following may help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_(statistics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top