Is this cublc polynomial function solvable?

AI Thread Summary
The cubic polynomial x^3 - x - 2 = 0 is indeed solvable, as all cubic equations have solutions. Users discussed methods to find solutions, including testing for divisibility and using synthetic division. The polynomial can be factored, revealing that (x-2) is a root, leading to a quotient of (x+1)^2. While Cardano's method is an option, simpler evaluation methods can also be effective. Overall, the consensus is that both polynomials mentioned are solvable through various algebraic techniques.
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Here is a very difficult cubic polynomial.

x^3 - x - 2 = 0

I am wondering whether it is solvable or not. Please think about it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I need help with this too I posted a similar one and haven't got a response... mine was x^3 + 9x -1=0...They are solvable, but I don't know how to get an answer algebraically or graphically.
 
EDIT: Deleted totally misleading answer. Ignore if you read it.
 
Last edited:
davedave said:
Here is a very difficult cubic polynomial.

x^3 - x - 2 = 0

I am wondering whether it is solvable or not. Please think about it.

aew782 said:
I need help with this too I posted a similar one and haven't got a response... mine was x^3 + 9x -1=0...They are solvable, but I don't know how to get an answer algebraically or graphically.

Are they solvable? Let's have a guess: The first one can be tested for divisibility by x+1, x-1, x+2, and x-2. The second one can be tested for divisibility by x+1 and x-1. The results may be faster if you know synthetic division.
 
symbolipoint said:
Are they solvable? Let's have a guess: The first one can be tested for divisibility by x+1, x-1, x+2, and x-2. The second one can be tested for divisibility by x+1 and x-1. The results may be faster if you know synthetic division.

Thank you that's all I needed!
 
You can use synthetic division, but isn't it simpler to just evaluate the polynomial and see if the equation is satisfied?
 
The first binomial rendering zero remainder is (x-2). The quotient is x^2+2x+1 which is (x+1)^2. No need to use Cardano's or Vietas substitution for this cubic (micromass gave a good reference Wikipedia article).
 
Back
Top