Is This Custom Lens Design Suitable for My Needs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ariebl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Lens
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a custom lens design for a CMOS sensor with specific imaging requirements. The proposed lens specifications include a focal length of 34mm and an f-stop of 2.8, which are deemed suitable for capturing images at distances between 50m and 200m. Key considerations include checking for chromatic and spherical aberrations, as well as ensuring the lens can achieve better resolution than the pixel size of 6 micrometers. The calculations suggest that the lens parameters should allow for effective imaging within the specified range, although real-world performance may vary. Overall, while the design appears promising, practical testing with an actual lens is recommended to confirm its effectiveness.
ariebl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello
Need to verify please if the following custom design lens is reasonable
-- Sensor: CMOS sensor, 1/3”, 6μm x 6μm pixel, Wide VGA 752H x 480V, 4.55mm x 2.97mm Imaging Area
-- Focus: 50m till 200m
-- Lens: f2.8; Focal length=34mm; Diameter=13mm
Pay attention I am not a physicist and also that this data is only for first estimation and not for lens production
Arie
 
Science news on Phys.org
Those number say very little about the lens, except that you should be able to find several commercial suppliers that can supply something similar for a reasonable price. Just a few examples I found after ~7 milliseconds of googling:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/404253-REG/Fujinon_HF35HA1B_2_3_C_Mount_35mm.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/519677-REG/Pentax_C33500KP_C33500KP_2_3_C_Mount.html

What is difficult in lens design is to correct chromatic and spherical aberrations, distortion, anti-reflective coatings etc. You mention nothing of that.

Why do you want to design your own lens?
 
thank M Quack for your answer
but let me, please, write my question in another words:
I have CMOS sensor, 1/3”, 6μm x 6μm pixel, Wide VGA 752H x 480V, 4.55mm x 2.97mm Imaging Area
And I need to add a lens to receive a focus from 50m till 200m
Can you please tell me if lens with f2.8, Focal length=34mm and Diameter=13mm will be OK?
Arie
 
Focal length 34mm divided by diameter 13mm gives f/2.6, so that part is OK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_aperture

Next, you want to check if the diffraction limit is better than your pixel size. Most lenses, however, do not reach the diffraction limit at f/2.8 due to unavoidable aberrations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_criterion#Explanation

You get about 2 micrometers, so that is OK, too, and with some margin to allow for less-than-perfect performance of the lens.

Finally, you want to check the depth of field to see if objects between 50 and 200m can be in focus. Use the pixel size as circle of confusion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field

The hyperfocal distance is about H=70m. If you focus your lens to that distance, then objects from H/2=35m to infinity will be in focus, i.e. the circle of confusion will be smaller than the pixel size.

So your parameters 34mm f/2.8 should allow you to image objects between 50 and 200m with better than 6 micrometers resolution onto your detector.

These estimates are valid for a perfect lens. Real life lenses will perform worse for the resolution limit. The size of the CCD does not enter anywhere here, but real life lenses will illuminate only a limited image field. So you need to check that when selecting the lens.
 


Thank you M Quack very very much
I just finished to read your answer and it looks great
not that I understood everything, but it is exactly what I was looking for
because I'm not a physicist I need to learn more a bout it
but I understood lens seems OK but need to test a real lens
again I really appreciate your help
Arie
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
5K
Back
Top