Usiia
- 29
- 4
It is a cubic relation.PeroK said:Just to say that I'm getting an "unsolvable" cubic equation in ##\tan \theta##. Does the question expect an exact solution?
The discussion revolves around a problem in electromagnetic theory, specifically involving forces between charged masses and their equilibrium conditions. Participants are examining the correctness of a solution and the underlying equations related to forces, angles, and distances in the context of the problem.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's equations and reasoning. Some have offered corrections and suggestions for improvement, while others are exploring different interpretations of the problem. There is a collaborative effort to refine the understanding of the relationships involved.
Participants note the importance of expressing answers in terms of given quantities, such as the length of the string, rather than unknown variables. There are also mentions of issues with formatting equations and the need for clearer diagrams to represent the problem accurately.
It is a cubic relation.PeroK said:Just to say that I'm getting an "unsolvable" cubic equation in ##\tan \theta##. Does the question expect an exact solution?
Of course this means nothing to me. I am supposing that this is a related rates problem and that I need more than what I think I have so far in terms of the tangent.Usiia said:Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
First, generate the force balancing equations for ##T, F## and ##mg##.Usiia said:Of course this means nothing to me. I am supposing that this is a related rates problem and that I need more than what I think I have so far in terms of the tangent.
Need to go to work now, but will come back to this with this approach.PeroK said:First, generate the force balancing equations for ##T, F## and ##mg##.
I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$Usiia said:Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
You are right, I missed the "/" it is the second.PeroK said:I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
PeroK said:I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
This can't be right. ##r = 2l \sin \theta##.Usiia said:$$ r = l \sin \theta $$
You have an extra factor of ##2q^2## there. The next line is correct, but doesn't follow from that:Usiia said:$$ F_c = \dfrac{2q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$
You got the right answer in the end, but there are still some mistakes.Usiia said:$$ F_c = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta}$$
Okay, but it's still wrong in some of your equations:Usiia said:I edited it, equations needed pruning and it missed my eye. Number 4 needed to be as you mentioned.
Usiia said:$$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$