Is This Electromagnetic Theory Solution Correct?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying the correctness of an electromagnetic theory solution, with participants identifying errors in equations and suggesting corrections. Key points include the initial miscalculation of forces, the importance of using proper variables for tension and electrostatic force, and the need for clarity in presenting equations, especially using LaTeX. Participants emphasize the relationship between the length of the string and the angles involved, leading to a cubic equation in tangent. Overall, the conversation highlights collaborative problem-solving and the iterative nature of refining mathematical solutions.
  • #31
PeroK said:
Just to say that I'm getting an "unsolvable" cubic equation in ##\tan \theta##. Does the question expect an exact solution?
It is a cubic relation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
 
  • #33
Usiia said:
Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
Of course this means nothing to me. I am supposing that this is a related rates problem and that I need more than what I think I have so far in terms of the tangent.
 
  • #34
Usiia said:
Of course this means nothing to me. I am supposing that this is a related rates problem and that I need more than what I think I have so far in terms of the tangent.
First, generate the force balancing equations for ##T, F## and ##mg##.
 
  • Like
Likes Usiia
  • #35
PeroK said:
First, generate the force balancing equations for ##T, F## and ##mg##.
Need to go to work now, but will come back to this with this approach.

Thank you so much!
 
  • #36
Usiia said:
Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
 
  • Like
Likes Usiia
  • #37
PeroK said:
I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
You are right, I missed the "/" it is the second.
 
  • #38
PeroK said:
I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$

I was able to reach your calculations. If you're feeling generous, give this a look?
  1. $$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{r^2} $$
  2. $$ \tau_x = F_c $$ (stability)
  3. $$ \tan \theta = \dfrac{\tau_x }{mg} $$
  4. $$ r = 2 l \sin \theta $$
  5. $$ q = 2q_{1}^{2} $$ (charge is twice the other of equal mass)

Substituting 4 into 1 yields,

$$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$
$$ F_c = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta}$$And Substituting 2 into 3 yields,

$$ \tan \theta = \dfrac{F_c}{mg} $$

Due to the stability condition. After simplification and arithmetic,

$$ \dfrac{\dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta} }{mg} = \tan \theta $$

$$ \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mg l^2 \sin^2 \theta} = \tan \theta $$

$$ \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mg l^2} = \tan \theta \sin^2 \theta$$
 
Last edited:
  • #39
Usiia said:
$$ r = l \sin \theta $$
This can't be right. ##r = 2l \sin \theta##.
Usiia said:
$$ F_c = \dfrac{2q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$
You have an extra factor of ##2q^2## there. The next line is correct, but doesn't follow from that:
Usiia said:
$$ F_c = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta}$$
You got the right answer in the end, but there are still some mistakes.
 
  • Like
Likes Usiia
  • #40
I edited it, equations needed pruning and it missed my eye. Number 4 needed to be as you mentioned.
 
  • #41
Usiia said:
I edited it, equations needed pruning and it missed my eye. Number 4 needed to be as you mentioned.
Okay, but it's still wrong in some of your equations:

Usiia said:
$$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$
 
  • #42
@PeroK Thank you so much for your continued help. I haven't done this in many many years and it's slowly coming back :)
 
  • #43
You are correct, I will try to take this into a latex editor and look it over. It's very difficult making sure it's right on the forum just using preview.

I am trying to copy this from my paper, but not uploading any more scratch work by hand.
 
  • #44
I believe this should be correct completely with the substitutions.
  1. $$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{r^2} $$
  2. $$ \tau_x = F_c $$ (stability)
  3. $$ \tan \theta = \dfrac{\tau_x }{mg} $$
  4. $$ r = 2 l \sin \theta $$
  5. $$ q_1q_2 = 2q_{1}^{2} $$ (charge is twice the other of equal mass)

Substituting 4 into 1 yields,

$$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(2 l \sin \theta)^2} $$
$$ F_c = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta}$$And Substituting 2 into 3 yields,

$$ \tan \theta = \dfrac{F_c}{mg} $$

Due to the stability condition. After simplification and arithmetic,

$$ \dfrac{\dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta} }{mg} = \tan \theta $$

$$ \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mg l^2 \sin^2 \theta} = \tan \theta $$

$$ \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mg l^2} = \tan \theta \sin^2 \theta$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BvU and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
460
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K