Is this equation for acceleration on this website wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion identifies a mistake on the website "A Physics Teacher" regarding the calculation of distance traveled during acceleration. The user correctly applies the second equation of motion, noting that the acceleration value of 2.5 m/s² was omitted in the website's equation. The correct calculation should include this value, leading to a distance of 3125 meters instead of the incorrectly stated 1250 meters. Participants agree that this oversight should be communicated to the website's author for correction. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in physics equations.
Physicsy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Greetings, I've been learning the mathematics of classical physics from a website called "A physiscs teacher" (http://aphysicsteacher.blogspot.com/search/label/acceleration). While looking through the equations on the acceleration i think i found a mistake made by the website.

A bus starts from rest and accelerates at a rate of 2.5 m/s2 for a time of 50 s. Determine the distance traveled by the bus during the acceleration phase.

Now let us identify the different variables involved.

u the initial speed = 0 m/s

t time taken = 50 s

a acceleration = 2.5 m/s2

s distance traveled = ?

If we want calculate s the distance traveled we will have to use the second equation of motion

S = ut + 1/2at2

Substituting the different values we get

S = ut + 1/2at(squared)

= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared)

= 0 + 0.5*2500

=1250 m

My problem with this question comes in when after the values have been substituated.
= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared), I am kinda new to the mathematical side of physics but shouldn't the acceleration (2.5) have been substituated in as well to make it
= o*50 + 0.5 *2.5 *50(squared) get an answer of 3125?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If
a=2.5 m/s²
t=50s
u=0
then
s = ut + ½at²
s = 0 + ½ x 2.5 x 50²
s = 3125m
 
Physicsy said:
S = ut + 1/2at(squared)
OK.

= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared)
Oops!


My problem with this question comes in when after the values have been substituated.
= o*50 + 0.5 *50(squared), I am kinda new to the mathematical side of physics but shouldn't the acceleration (2.5) have been substituated in as well to make it
= o*50 + 0.5 *2.5 *50(squared) get an answer of 3125?
Of course. The webpage goofed in leaving out the acceleration. (It was obviously an oversight.) Send the author an email suggesting that he correct the page! He will appreciate the correction.

Good catch. :wink:
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top