Is this integral convergent or divergent?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence or divergence of the integral dx/(4x^2 + 4x + 5) over the interval from negative infinity to infinity. Participants explore the implications of using comparison tests and the behavior of the integrand near points of discontinuity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using comparison tests to evaluate convergence, with some attempting to compare the original integral to simpler forms. Questions arise regarding the evaluation of limits and the implications of substituting values into the integrand.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the integral's behavior, with some participants suggesting that the original integral is convergent and can be evaluated directly. Concerns about the continuity of comparison functions and the implications of improper integrals are also noted.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential issues with evaluating integrals at points of discontinuity, particularly at x = 0, and the relevance of the continuity of the integrand in determining convergence.

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether the following integral is convergent or divergent. If convergent, what does it converge to?

dx/(4x^2 + 4x + 5) [-infinity, infinity]

Homework Equations


comparison theorem?

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it is convergent, so I set the original integral less than or equal to dx/4x^2.
Solving the integral and setting up a limit, I got the limit as t-->infinity of (4x^-1)/-1 evaluated from [-infinity, t]. Now here is where I get lost. Evaluating it at t gives 0, but when I plug in the lower limit of 0, isn't it possible to say that the 0 either belongs in the numerator if there is a -1 exponent there, as well as saying that it doesn't exist if I move (4x^-1) into the denominator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fk378 said:
I think it is convergent, so I set the original integral less than or equal to dx/4x^2.
Solving the integral and setting up a limit, I got the limit as t-->infinity of (4x^-1)/-1 evaluated from [-infinity, t]. Now here is where I get lost. Evaluating it at t gives 0, but when I plug in the lower limit of 0, isn't it possible to say that the 0 either belongs in the numerator if there is a -1 exponent there, as well as saying that it doesn't exist if I move (4x^-1) into the denominator?

I think you want to be careful about comparing your integral to the integral for (4x)^(-2), because that function is not continuous at x = 0 , so you can't use the Fundamental Theorem on it and its integral doesn't converge as x approaches 0.

For the purpose of proof, you may be better off evaluating the original integral itself, since that integrand is continuous. You are correct that it is convergent and can be evaluated using a "completion of squares" technique (since the quadratic is irreducible).
 
So if I want to plug in 0 into (4x^-1) then I have to move the 4x to the bottom instead of keeping it at the top with the -1 exponent?
 
fk378 said:
So if I want to plug in 0 into (4x^-1) then I have to move the 4x to the bottom instead of keeping it at the top with the -1 exponent?

It's all the same: the point is that this is 1/(4x), so putting zero in for x will make this undefined. The type II improper integral about x = 0 for dx/(4x^2) diverges, so it's no help in making a comparison with your integral.

Fortunately, the type I improper integral you are given is not particularly difficult to evaluate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K