Is this statement acceptable? (time derivative of a rotating vector)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of a statement regarding the time derivative of a rotating vector, specifically addressing the treatment of delta t in the approximation. It confirms that both delta phi and delta t are positive, aligning their signs in the context of angular motion. The forum participants explore the formal derivation of the time derivative of a vector with constant magnitude and changing direction, emphasizing the relationship between the unit vector and its angular change. The acceptance of the limit statement regarding delta A and delta t is questioned, with a counterexample provided to illustrate that it is not universally valid. Overall, the conversation highlights the nuances in mathematical definitions and their implications in vector calculus.
Clockclocle
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Is this statement acceptable?
Relevant Equations
..........
Capture.PNG


I understand the approximation statement but he divide the |delta t| in the left but only delta t on the right. Is it true because delta phi would have the same sign as delta t ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. By definition ##\Delta \phi## is positive and the angle increases in the direction of the arrow in the top figure. ##\Delta t## is always positive.
 
kuruman said:
Yes. By definition ##\Delta \phi## is positive and the angle increases in the direction of the arrow in the top figure. ##\Delta t## is always positive.
He also use the fact that lim |##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##| = |lim ##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##|. Is that accepted?
 
There is a more formal way to show the same thing which I prefer.

You have a vector ##\mathbf A## that has constant magnitude ##A## and direction ##\mathbf {\hat a}## that changes with time. You can write the vector as its constant magnitude times the unit vector specifying the direction, ##\mathbf A=A~\mathbf {\hat a}##. Now $$\frac{d\mathbf A}{dt}=A\frac{d\mathbf {\hat a}}{dt}.$$ To find the derivative of the unit vector ##\mathbf a##, consider the drawing on the right. A
Unit Vectors.png
unit vector in the direction of changing angle ##\theta## is perpendicular to ##\mathbf {\hat a}.## In terms of the fixed Cartesian unit vectors
$$\begin{align} & \mathbf {\hat a}=\cos\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat x}+\sin\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat y} \\
& \mathbf {\hat {\theta}}=-\sin\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat x}+\cos\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat y}
\end{align}$$Now from equation (1) $$\frac{d\mathbf {\hat a}}{dt}=\frac{d\theta}{dt}(-\sin\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat x}+\cos\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat y})=\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf {\hat{\theta}}$$ and the time rate of change of the constant-magnitude vector ##\mathbf A## is $$\frac{d\mathbf A}{dt}=A\frac{d\mathbf {\hat a}}{dt}=A\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf {\hat{\theta}}.$$
 
Clockclocle said:
He also use the fact that lim |##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##| = |lim ##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##|. Is that accepted?
Not in general. Consider ##\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}(-1)^{\lfloor \frac 1x\rfloor}##.
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
827
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K