Is Tk Always Positive If T is a Positive Operator in Linear Algebra?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if T is a positive operator in linear algebra, then T raised to any positive integer k (Tk) is also positive. Participants clarify that a positive operator T has a positive square root, denoted as S, such that T = S². They explore proof techniques, including mathematical induction and contradiction, to establish that remains non-negative for all k ≥ 1. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and properties of positive operators and matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of positive operators in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Concept of positive matrices and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of positive operators in linear algebra
  • Learn about mathematical induction proofs in depth
  • Explore the concept of contradiction in mathematical proofs
  • Review the definitions and characteristics of positive matrices
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, as well as researchers interested in operator theory and proof techniques.

evilpostingmong
Messages
338
Reaction score
0
positive operator proof

Homework Statement


Prove that if T ∈ L(V) is positive, then so is Tk for every positive
integer k.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let v=b1v1+...+bnvn. Now since T is positive, T has a positive square root. T=S^2. <S^2v, v>=<S^2v1, v>+...+<S^2vn, v>. Now <S^4v, v>=<S^2v1, v>^2+...+<S^2vn, v>^2 yes? Now since S^2 is positive, S^4 is positive. And since S^4 is>=S^2,
<S^4v1, v>+...+<S^4vn, v> is >=<S^2v1, v>+...+<S^2vn, v> which is >=0.
But this doesn't show that its true for S^2k. I remember learning about a technique
called induction. Should that be used?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmmm. The one you got there looks like it only deals with powers of 2 even if you did prove it by induction.

Let's get the definitions sorted first. A positive matrix is a matrix with all its elements >0 right?

The idea behind induction is that you want to prove a base case. This is just another name for the simplest case there is. For example, you would want to prove that this is true for k=1 in this case. And then you consider the k+1 case, for all k >= 1. If you want to learn more, I suggest that you read some actual proofs by induction.

It sounds like an induction proof but I think you can also just prove this by contradiction. Assume that there exists some k such that T^k is non-positive.
 
aostraff said:
hmmmm. The one you got there looks like it only deals with powers of 2 even if you did prove it by induction.

Let's get the definitions sorted first. A positive matrix is a matrix with all its elements >0 right?

The idea behind induction is that you want to prove a base case. This is just another name for the simplest case there is. For example, you would want to prove that this is true for k=1 in this case. And then you consider the k+1 case, for all k >= 1. If you want to learn more, I suggest that you read some actual proofs by induction.

It sounds like an induction proof but I think you can also just prove this by contradiction. Assume that there exists some k such that T^k is non-positive.

Oh ok. Thanks for the help! Btw no offense, but my book said that for T to be positive, <Tv, v> >=0 so T can be a 0 map. But I like your hint, very nice!

Now we assume that T is positive when k=1. Now if T is positive when k=1,
then there must be some k where Tk is negative, for k>1.
Now <Tv, v> is >=0. And <Tkv, v> is <0. But k is >1.
And T has elements >=0. And Tk=Tk-1T.
Therefore <Tkv, v> is >=<Tv, v>.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K