Is V a Vector Space with Transpose-Modified Scalar Multiplication?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether the set V of 2x2 matrices can be classified as a vector space under the defined operations of normal addition and modified scalar multiplication β#A=β(A^T). The key conclusion is that V does not satisfy the vector space criteria because not all matrices fulfill the condition A=A^T, which is essential for the multiplicative identity to hold true. The participants explore the implications of this modified multiplication and the necessity of a valid multiplicative identity in vector space definitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector space axioms
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and properties
  • Knowledge of matrix transposition
  • Concept of scalar multiplication in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and their axioms
  • Learn about the implications of matrix transposition on vector space definitions
  • Investigate the concept of multiplicative identity in different mathematical structures
  • Explore examples of scalar multiplication in various vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians exploring vector space theory, and educators teaching matrix operations and properties.

NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let V= set of 2x2 matrices with the normal addition, but where multiplication is defined as: β#A=β(A^T) where A^T is the transpose of A.


Homework Equations


The axiom about 1#A=A


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that because you can show that not ALL matrices satisfy A=A^T, you can't have a vector space since the multiplication by 1 doesn't hold up.

But then I'm wondering whether I'm assuming that the multiplicative identity should be the "normal" 1 (ie that 1 is just the scalar 1 in a normal R^n vector space).

How do you prove a multiplicative identity absolutely does NOT exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So are you trying to prove that V is a vector space if it obeys the normal matrix addition, but has a unique multiplication scalar multiplication defined as # which is sort of a mapping from A to At?

Your notation is a bit confusing to me.
 
NullSpace0 said:

Homework Statement


Let V= set of 2x2 matrices with the normal addition, but where multiplication is defined as: β#A=β(A^T) where A^T is the transpose of A.


Homework Equations


The axiom about 1#A=A


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that because you can show that not ALL matrices satisfy A=A^T, you can't have a vector space since the multiplication by 1 doesn't hold up.

But then I'm wondering whether I'm assuming that the multiplicative identity should be the "normal" 1 (ie that 1 is just the scalar 1 in a normal R^n vector space).

How do you prove a multiplicative identity absolutely does NOT exist?

If there were a scalar β that was a multiplicative identity it would have to satisfy β(A^T)=A for all matrices A. Show there isn't.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K