Is Velocity Always Constant in Physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dock
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the assertion that velocity (v) must be considered constant when defined as the derivative of position (x) with respect to time (t), specifically in the context of classical mechanics. User Don Kihot argues against the conventional understanding of differential calculus in physics, claiming that traditional equations like dx = vdt only hold true under the assumption of constant velocity. Several participants, including Warren and Hurkyl, counter this by emphasizing that velocity can vary and that the notation used in physics must adhere to strict mathematical conventions to avoid ambiguity. The debate highlights the importance of precise definitions and the implications of variable versus constant velocity in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus, specifically derivatives and differentials.
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics concepts, including Newton's laws of motion.
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and its application in physics.
  • Ability to differentiate functions and interpret their physical meaning.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of variable velocity in classical mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of calculus, focusing on derivatives and their physical interpretations.
  • Research the historical context of Newtonian physics and its evolution in modern physics.
  • Explore advanced topics in differential equations as they apply to motion and dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of motion and the mathematical rigor required in physics. It is particularly relevant for those examining the relationship between calculus and classical mechanics.

  • #31
What the hell is going on here.

I read someone arguing that velocity was a constant and now there is talk of making t a dependent variable.

Can someone explain what points are trying to be made here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
actually the problem was:
whenever one defines V as dx/dt V has to be constant.
if V is variable then dx=Vdt+tdV instead of dx=Vdt.

what do you think of it as a mathematician, ObsessiveMathsFreak?
 
  • #33
And to me it seems that Dock is going through a phase I once went through... except that Dock is promoting his misunderstandings to the level of belief while I spent effort trying to figure out the underlying structures that rigorously support these types of manipulations.


I thought it might help dock to see the explicit pieces that go into some of these manipulations; I know it would've helped me back then.

Hurkyl
 
  • #34
Actually, dx = vdt does not imply that v is a constant, it merely implies that x = vt − ∫tdv. I have no problem with this.
 
  • #35
v = dx/dt

I think this fact is agreed upon by all at least.

What does it mean. It means that velocity is the instantaneous rate of change of distance. In other words, at any given instant, v is a measure of how fast you are going.


but what happens in the case of

x = Sin(t)

does your formula work then.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K