Is |x^3-1| One to One? Monotonicity and Inverse Function Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function |x^3-1|, specifically examining its properties related to being one-to-one and its monotonicity. Participants are exploring whether the function has an inverse based on these characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the function not being one-to-one and the necessity of providing counterexamples to support claims. There is also a focus on the sufficiency of the statements made regarding the function's properties.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes affirmations of correctness regarding the initial statements, but also highlights the need for further exploration through counterexamples. Some participants express gratitude for clarifications provided, indicating a collaborative atmosphere.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the requirement for counterexamples to substantiate claims about the function's properties, suggesting that the original poster may have omitted specific examples in their initial attempt.

peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the function |x^3-1| one to one? Is it monotonous?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Since |x^3-1|=|y^3-1| does not necessarily imply that x=y for every x and y, I presume it is not one to one. Hence it has no inverse function.
It is also not monotonous.
Are all these statements correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes :smile:
 
Hi tiny-tim,
Once again, thanks a lot! :-)
 
While the statements are correct, they are not sufficient to complete the exercise. To actually solve it, you need to find counterexamples. For example, if you want to show that [itex]|x^3-1|[/itex] is not one-to-one, you need to come up with two particular and distinct points x and y such that [itex]|x^3-1|=|y^3-1|[/itex]. Just saying that it is one-to-one is not enough without counterexample.
 
Have done so, simply didn't specify it :-). Thank you, micromass!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
280
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K