Is x equal to the 4th root of y in the equation y=x^4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
If ##y=x^4##, so x is equal to ##\pm \sqrt[4]{y}## or x is equal to ##\pm \sqrt[2]{\pm \sqrt[2]{y}}## ?

Well, I think that x is qual to ##\pm \sqrt[4]{y}## because

##
\\y=x^4
\\\sqrt[4]{y} = \sqrt[4]{x^4} = \sqrt[2]{\sqrt[2]{(x^2)^2}} = \sqrt[2]{|x^2|} = \sqrt[2]{|x|^2} = ||x|| = |x|
\\ \pm \sqrt[4]{y}=x
##

Right!?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If y is non-negative, this is indeed the real solutions for x.
 
Jhenrique said:
If ##y=x^4##, so x is equal to ##\pm \sqrt[4]{y}## or x is equal to ##\pm \sqrt[2]{\pm \sqrt[2]{y}}## ?

Well, I think that x is qual to ##\pm \sqrt[4]{y}## because

##
\\y=x^4
\\\sqrt[4]{y} = \sqrt[4]{x^4} = \sqrt[2]{\sqrt[2]{(x^2)^2}} = \sqrt[2]{|x^2|} = \sqrt[2]{|x|^2} = ||x|| = |x|
\\ \pm \sqrt[4]{y}=x
##

Right!?
This is a basic algebra question that you should be able to answer for yourself.

If y = 16 = 24, then y = ##\pm##2. These are the only real fourth roots of 16. The other two roots are imaginary.

Some of what you wrote above is unnecessary, such as replacing x2 by |x2|. If x is real, then x2 ≥ 0, so x2 and |x2| represent the same number.

This notation -- ||x|| -- means the norm of x, in which the context is usually that x is a vector or something in a vector space. It's overkill to use ||x|| when all you mean is the absolute value, |x|.
 
Note that people are saying "the real roots". If y is a positive real number then it has 2 real fourth roots and two imaginary roots. If y is not a positive real number then all four fourth roots are complex numbers.
 
A) ||x|| isn't the norm of, is the abs of abs of x.

B) I didn't omit the abs in |x|² for efect of step-by-step.

C) All roots of equation ##y = x^4## is given by ##x=\pm\sqrt[2]{\pm\sqrt[2]{y}}##. But, if ##f(x) = x^4##, the inverse function is given simply ##f^{-1}(x) = \pm \sqrt[4]{x}##. Also, if ##f(z) = z^4##, thus maybe the inverse function is probably given by ##f^{-1}(z) = \pm\sqrt[2]{\pm\sqrt[2]{z}}## and not by ##f^{-1}(z) = \pm \sqrt[4]{z}##. But, I don't know how to verify this, cause I don't know how and where I can plot a complex graphic.
 
Jhenrique said:
A) ||x|| isn't the norm of, is the abs of abs of x.
Why do this? The absolute value of a real number is nonnegative, so there's no point in taking the absolute value again.
Jhenrique said:
B) I didn't omit the abs in |x|² for efect of step-by-step.
Then you're adding extra, unnecessary steps. All you need to say is that ##\sqrt{x^2} = |x|##. And as I mentioned in another thread, including the index of 2 on your square root is completely unnecessary. This is one of a number of shortcuts that we take in mathematics. For example, we rarely write 1x in place of x, or y1 when we mean y.
Jhenrique said:
C) All roots of equation ##y = x^4## is given by ##x=\pm\sqrt[2]{\pm\sqrt[2]{y}}##. But, if ##f(x) = x^4##, the inverse function is given simply ##f^{-1}(x) = \pm \sqrt[4]{x}##.
No.
What you wrote for the inverse is not a function. f is not a one-to-one function, so it doesn't have an inverse. However, if we restrict the domain to x ≥ 0, then f is now one-to-one, and its inverse is f-1(x) = ##\sqrt[4]{x}##. No ##\pm##.
Jhenrique said:
Also, if ##f(z) = z^4##, thus maybe the inverse function is probably given by ##f^{-1}(z) = \pm\sqrt[2]{\pm\sqrt[2]{z}}## and not by ##f^{-1}(z) = \pm \sqrt[4]{z}##. But, I don't know how to verify this, cause I don't know how and where I can plot a complex graphic.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top