Isotope Stability: Factors Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter nordica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotope Stability
nordica
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello,
new & amazed by all the knowledge and passion on these forums..wow! well no questions are stupid i hope. I've been looking into basic radioactivity lately and it has led me to some question marks about isotopes' stability. The isotopes in question are ^{108}Ag and ^{110}Ag with the half lifes of respectively ca 142 and 25 seconds. Fine, i thought in my simple mind, the 110 has more excessive neutrons that makes it more unstable. Then of course realized the crack in that, since for example ^{109}Ag is in fact stable. And so on. So obviously it's not that simple, but can someone explain what factors determine a nucleus's stability? I mean i know it has to do with proton-neutron ratio and binding energy but when looking at something like this example, i have a hard time seeing how it makes sense. (I hope I make sense though, english being my 2nd language and scientific english about my 23rd..)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am no expert in this field, but it looks like around 108 nucleons, Ag is stable. The stable isotopes being 107 and 109. It might be that in this case an even number of neutrons is more stable than an odd number, thus 108 is radioactive.
 
There are very few stable nuclei with both an odd number of neutrons and protons: Deuterium, Li-6, B-10, N-14. K-40 and V-50 are almost stable.
 
Oh! I see. Wasn't familiar with the significance of odd/even, i will read up a bit on that. thanks a lot!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Back
Top