Issue calculating the velocity of pions from K-meson decay

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of pions resulting from K-meson decay using measurements from hydrogen bubble chamber tracks. Key parameters include a K0 track length of 0.016 m, curvature radii of 0.65 m for π+ and 0.50 m for π-, and a magnetic field of 1.4 Teslas. The momentum calculations yield 382.6 MeV/c for π+ and 294.3 MeV/c for π-. The correct approach to determine velocity involves using relativistic equations, specifically the relationship E² = (mc²)² + (pc)², and ensuring proper unit conversions between MeV and joules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic momentum and energy equations
  • Familiarity with magnetic fields and their effects on charged particles
  • Knowledge of kinematics, particularly in particle physics
  • Ability to convert between energy units (MeV to joules)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the equation E² = (mc²)² + (pc)²
  • Learn about the Lorentz factor and its role in relativistic physics
  • Explore the implications of magnetic fields on particle trajectories in bubble chambers
  • Investigate energy-momentum conservation in particle decay processes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and anyone involved in experimental particle detection and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

mountevans
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We were supplied with several images of hydrogen bubble chamber tracks, from which we measured the length of the (invisible) K0 track, angles of departure from the K0 meson's track and curvature. As a way to limit the amount of data we're talking about, I'll only discuss the first particle. The length of the K0's track was 0.016 m, the radius of curvature of the π+ was 0.65 m, the π- 0.50 m, the angles of departure (π+-) were 44 and 24 degrees respectively, and the magnetic field was 1.4 Teslas.

The momentum of the positive k meson tracks is given as 535 MeV/c. Rest mass of positive and negative pions is 139.57 MeV/c2. c = 3*108 m/s, of course.

Homework Equations


p = q*r*B
T = 1/2 mv2
γ = 1/√(1-v2/c2)
p [in MeV/c] = 3 ∗ 102 ∗ r [in m] ∗ B [in T]
F = mv2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the formula for p above, 3 ∗ 102 * (0.65 m) * (1.4 T), I get 382.6 MeV/c for the π+ and 294.3 MeV/c for the π- total momenta.

However, I'm now at the step where I think I need to determine the total energy of the pions so I can apply a gamma correction to their speed. When I take the above equations,

F = mv2/r and p = mv = q*r*B

I find that v must equal q*r*B/m, where m is the mass(-energy?) of the pions. So, here appears to lie my mistake: I divided 382.6 MeV/c by 139.57 MeV/c2, and got 2.74, which I would assume is in units of c (which can't be right for v, since nothing exceeds v least of all a pion). So it seems like I'm missing a factor here - should I have converted the momenta in MeV/c to eV/c?

For the later components of this homework, we simply use 2D kinematics to find the momentum vectors of the pions - the sum of the components in-axis with the path of the kaon should equal the momentum of the neutral kaon, and the total momentum in the normal axis should sum to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mountevans said:
F = mv2/r and p = mv = q*r*B
Those equations are non-relativistic. You can use the relationship ##E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2## where ##E## is the total energy of the particle and ##p## is the relativistic momentum. Also, your expression for the kinetic energy is should be ##T=(\gamma-1)mc^2 = E - mc^2##.
 
vela said:
Those equations are non-relativistic. You can use the relationship ##E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2## where ##E## is the total energy of the particle and ##p## is the relativistic momentum. Also, your expression for the kinetic energy is should be ##T=(\gamma-1)mc^2 = E - mc^2##.

Is ##p=γmv## correct in this instance? (where m = rest mass). Would the rest energy of the pion be 139.57 * (3*108)2 MeV, rather than the mass (in MeV/c2)? When going from mass to energy, if I'm not using c=1, I need to actually multiply by c2, right?
 
Last edited:
It was simply a problem with converting between MeV and J, if you can believe it. This page was very helpful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K