It seems easy, but I don't get it

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karlx
  • Start date Start date
Karlx
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody.
Once more, I need your help.

The following is a problem that appears in Rohatgi's "An introduction to Probability and Statistics":

"Each of n urns contains four white and six black balls, while another urn contains five white and five black balls. An urn is chosen at random from the (n+1) urns, and two balls are drawn from it, both being black. The probability that five white and three black balls remain in the chosen urn is 1/7. Find n."

My first guess would be that n=6, but the solution given in the book is n=4.

Someone can tell me if I am wrong or there is a mistake in the book ?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is the following one:

The probability that five white and three black balls remain in the chosen urn is zero for the n urns that had initially only four white balls.
For the urn that had initially 5 white and 5 black balls, the probability of having 5 white and 3 black balls after having drawn 2 black balls is 1.
The probability that this former is the chosen urn is 1/(n+1).
So n must be equal to 6.

Am I wrong or there is a mistake in the book?
I would appreciate your hints.
Thanks
 
Let's say E is the event that the urn with 5 white and 5 balls is chosen, and B is the number of black balls drawn. You are told that

P(E \;|\; B=2) = 1/7.

By definition, P(E \;|\; B=2) = \frac{P(E \; \cap \; B=2)}{P(B=2)}.

Take it from there.
 
Thanks for your answer, awkward.
This was my first attempt to the problem, but I wrote it in the following terms:

Let's say A is the event that five white and three black balls remain in the chosen urn, B is the number of black balls drawn and Cm is the event that the urn m has been chosen.
Then we are told that

<br /> P(A \;|\; B=2) = \frac{P(A \; \cap \; B=2)}{P(B=2)}<br />

where
<br /> P(A \; \cap \; B=2) = \sum_{m=1}^{n+1}p(C_{m})p(A\; \cap \; B=2 \;|\; C_{m}) = \sum_{m=1}^{n+1} p(A\; \cap \; B=2 \cap \; C_{m})<br />

and my problem was that I did not apply correctly the multiplication rule, that is

<br /> p(A\; \cap \; B=2 \cap \; C_{m}) = p(C_{m}) p(B=2 \;|\; C_{m}) p(A \;|\; B=2 \cap \; C_{m})<br />

If I apply it correctly, then I obtain the result n=4, the same that appears in the book, and indeed the same if I apply your hint.
Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top