Iterated dimensional regularization

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regularization
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of iterated dimensional regularization on a 2-loop integral involving variables p and q. The author proposes integrating over q while treating p as constant, leading to a function F(p, e^{-1}). They question whether dimensional regularization can be applied iteratively to each variable, emphasizing that the feasibility depends on the nature of the function F(q, p). It is noted that to perform integrals over multiple variables, one must have appropriate relationships between those variables. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the iterative application of dimensional regularization to achieve finite results.
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
let be the 2-loop integral

\iint d^{k}pd^{k}qF(q,p)

where k is the dimension so we regularize it by dimensional regularization

the my idea is the following

i integrate oper ''q' considering p is constant to get F(p,e^{-1} )

here e is the parameter inside k=4-e

after dimensional regularization over q i have an integral over 'p' , so i apply dimensional regularization again to obtain a regularized value

can this be done ?? i mean can we apply dimensional regularization iteratively over each variable ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
not quiet. if the integral is doable or not will depend on what the function F(q,p) represents. of course to do an integral over n variables you have to perform the integral n times, but you also need n-1 expressions relating your n-variables all together. so if you have a relation that will translate F(q,p) in terms of F(k(p),p), then you can do the integral over dp first taking q to be a constant.
 
but can it be done iteratively ??

for example i make dimensional regularization over 'p' keeping 'q' constant and afterwards i make use of dimensional regularization over q to get a finite result.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K