IV curve on photoelectric effect

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Well, according to Einstein's explanation of photoelectric effect, I know that above cutoff frequency, the high frequency the incident photon is, the more electrons will be strike out. Now we add the batter on the photoelectric apparatus. At some negative voltage (stop voltage) there is no photoelectric current. At that voltage we increase the voltage gradually, we will also see the current increase (nonlinearly), and if we keep increase the voltage and over some big value, the current almost doesn't change. I wonder why in the beginning the current change rapidly and nonlinearly and later it is also flat?

In addition, if we compare the I-V curve of two different incident light with different frequency but same intensity. According to experimental data, we see that the curves start from different stop voltage and the currents increases gradually. Simple analysis tells us the higher the frequency of the photon, the larger (absolute value) the stop voltage is. Since the intensity of these two lights are the same, and intensity is defined as

<br /> I = \frac{\textnormal{number of photon}}{\textnormal{sec}\cdot\textnormal{m}^2}h\nu<br />

we see that if I unchanged, higher frequency will lead to less number of photon in unit time. So higher-frequency light will strike out less photoelectrons in unit time. If we consider the I-V curve at V=0, the current corresponding to high frequency should be lower that that corresponding to low frequency, but why the actual case is just the opposite?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KFC said:
Well, according to Einstein's explanation of photoelectric effect, I know that above cutoff frequency, the high frequency the incident photon is, the more electrons will be strike out.

This is not completely true. The higher the frequency of the photon, the higher the energy of the photoelectrons. It isn't necessarily "more electrons", especially if the photon flux remains the same (and the quantum efficiency isn't a factor).

Now we add the batter on the photoelectric apparatus. At some negative voltage (stop voltage) there is no photoelectric current. At that voltage we increase the voltage gradually, we will also see the current increase (nonlinearly), and if we keep increase the voltage and over some big value, the current almost doesn't change. I wonder why in the beginning the current change rapidly and nonlinearly and later it is also flat?

Because in the beginning, you are losing electrons. Not all electrons emitted by the cathode make it to the anode. As you increase the bias, you are collecting more electrons. At some point, you will be collecting ALL of the electrons and increasing the bias doesn't give you more.

Zz.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top