Ive been pondering these for a while

  • Thread starter Thread starter OrbsAndSuch
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between pure and applied mathematics, with pure math focusing on theoretical concepts while applied math involves real-world applications of those theories. The participant expresses interest in pursuing astrophysics at a university like Berkeley but is concerned about the quality of teaching based on past experiences with uninspiring instructors. There is a query about the practical applications of differential equations in music, particularly regarding sine wave distortion. Responses indicate that experiences with professors can vary widely, and while some may find certain courses unengaging, others have had positive experiences. The conversation also touches on personal experiences with differential equations in both pure and applied contexts, highlighting the differences in course content and teaching styles. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of finding engaging instructors and the relevance of mathematical concepts in various fields.
OrbsAndSuch
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am a freshman in college, and i have a while to pick my major, and eventually my career, but I figured I should start thinking now. Sorry if these questions seem completely random, but this how i think, and this series of questions has turned into a sort of half-rant, but any help/advice/questions/discussion is appreciated. Let's continue:

Whats the difference between "pure" and "applied" mathematics? First thing that comes to my mind is that "Pure" math is basically concepts and theory, and "Applied" math is those theories and concepts applied to the real world. Is this correct?

Which universities have strong programs for either? I know the Berkeley has an Applied Mathematics program, but I am not sure if Applied is for me.

Ive always been fascinated with planets and stars and galaxies - space in general - and Astrophysics seems to be the right path. For years, my plan was, in fact, Berkeley for Astrophysics, but my past few Physics instructors have... desensitized, for lack of better word, my interest in Physics - the physics itself wasn't boring, the teachers were. Is this gong to be the case everywhere i go to school?

For lack of further evidence, I feel a subject change is in order.

Do differential equations have a practical application in music? (i.e. distortion of sine waves?) I know there are probably simpler ways for distortion, but differential equations have always been intriguing to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For question 1, well, they are pretty much the same in the higher level. Sometimes I tend to think that Applied math is just one of the subfields in math.
About question 2, well, I am pretty sure that it is not a phenomnenon across the board. At least in my school, I really liked some of my professors, and most of them are knowledgeable, intellengent (duh!). I am pretty sure that almost none of them are boring. I guess you are probably just not that lucky.
 
Many, many years ago, I signed up for a differential equations course in the Pure Math department. We spent the whole semester talking about the properties of the solutions of
y''+k^2*y = 0
without ever actually saying what those solutions were. We proved a whole slew of properties about those solutions (I can't remember a one of them today), but we never solved the differential equation, and that was the only DE we discussed. I got a B.

The following semester, I signed up for differential equations in the Applied Math department. We talked about all manner of differential equations, but mostly we talked about the Wronskian (the subject of the teacher's dissertation). I got a C.

I decided I could not afford to take any more DE classes, so I went on to take Laplace Transforms, Fourier Transforms, and a mess of other stuff, and essentially taught myself differential equations, much of it through working on the analog computer.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
974
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top