How Do You Apply Jacobian Transformation to Evaluate a Double Integral?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Jacobian transformation to evaluate the double integral of the function (x-3y) over a triangular region defined by specific vertices. The transformation equations x = 2u + v and y = u + 2v are established, leading to the calculation of the Jacobian, which is found to be 3. Initial attempts to set up the integral resulted in an incorrect answer of -4/5, prompting a reevaluation of the limits for v and the inclusion of the Jacobian in the final calculation. After correcting the limits and applying the Jacobian correctly, the final answer obtained is -3. The importance of including the Jacobian in transformations for accurate area representation is emphasized.
tnutty
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Use the given transformation to evaluate the given integral.


\int\int(x-3y)DA
R.

where R is the triangular region with vertices (0,0), (2,1) and (1,2) ; x = 2u + v , y = u + 2v



Trial :

Using the points given I came up with these equations for the triangle lines :

y = 2x;
y = 1/2x;
y = 3 - x;

Now just substituting x = 2u and y = u+2v I get this :

u = 0
v = 0
v = 3(1-u)

plotting this , I see that 0<= u <= 1 and 0<= v <= 3(1-u)

And from the original integral the integrand is x - 3y. Again substituting
for x and y with the given transformation coordinate for u and v I get :

(x-3y)DA = -(u+5v) dv*du

Now the integral becomes :

\int^{1}_{0} du\int^{3-3u}_{0} -u - 5v dvdu

In which I get the answer -4/5 which is not correct. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok so the variable transformation sounds alright, but where is the Jacobian...? (as in the title)

as do you the variable change, you are effectivley rotating & squeezes the axes, dA = dx dy \neq dudv. So to preserve the original area you need to include the jacobian
 
Last edited:
Since :

x = 2u + v , y = u + 2v

The jacobian is :

|2 1|
|1 2|
= 2*2 - 1*1 = 3 ;

The the answer is -4/5* 3 = -12/5 ?

I still did something wrong I guess.
 
the limit for v is 0<y<1-u because v=1-u not 3(1-u) and you also need to include the jacobian in your equation, but you can just multiply the final answer you get by (3) instead of doing all your integrals after multiplying with the jacobian. And after doing this question I got -3 as the final answer.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K