Jarque-Bera Test: Chi-Square Distribution Table

kimberley
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

Wikipedia states:

"The [Jarque-Bera] statistic has an asymptotic chi-square distribution with two degrees of freedom and can be used to test the null hypothesis that the data are from a normal distribution. The null hypothesis is a joint hypothesis of both the skewness and excess kurtosis being 0, since samples from a normal distribution have an expected skewness of 0 and an expected excess kurtosis of 0. As the definition of JB shows, any deviation from this increases the JB statistic."

When I look at the Chi-Square Distribution Table at the .05 confidence interval, it returns the number 5.99. Out of an abundance of caution, does this mean that if my Jarque-Bera test statistic is greater than 5.99, that the null hypothesis of normality is rejected? This would seem to be correct since the JB statistic is usually only greater than 5.99 if the skew and excess kurtosis are relatively far from 0, and the JB statistic tends to be closer to 1 or less than 1 when skew and excess kurtosis are close to 0. Thank you in advance.

Kim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be correct.
 
Thanks Again Enuma

EnumaElish said:
That would be correct.


Much appreciated.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top