Johnson noise power distribution?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of the Johnson noise power distribution in LRC circuits, particularly in relation to thermal noise and black body radiation. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings and mathematical formulations presented in Feynman's lectures, raising questions about dimensional analysis and the relationship between thermal noise and circuit components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the derivation of the power distribution formula P(w)dw=(2/pi)ktdw and questions its validity based on dimensional analysis, suggesting a potential oversight in the relationship between power, thermal energy, and frequency.
  • Another participant points out that the formula represents power per unit bandwidth, referencing external sources for clarification on Johnson-Nyquist noise.
  • A participant discusses their understanding of the derivation involving black body radiation and harmonic oscillators, but expresses uncertainty about how this relates to thermal noise in circuits.
  • There is a repeated emphasis that only resistors contribute to thermal noise, while inductors and capacitors influence bandwidth, suggesting a need for clarity in the representation of noise voltage in relation to resistance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants show varying levels of understanding regarding the derivation of the power distribution and its implications. While some agree on certain aspects of the theory, there remains significant uncertainty and disagreement about the connections between the concepts discussed, particularly regarding the role of different circuit components in generating thermal noise.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the explanations provided in the original text, particularly regarding the clarity of the derivation and the assumptions made about the relationship between thermal noise and circuit elements. There is also a noted dependence on definitions of terms such as power and intensity.

Fr33Fa11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I've been reading through the Feynman lectures (almost done with Volume 1), and I have been trying to prove everything to myself. I have a bit of a problem now though, in Chapter 41 on Brownian motion, Feynman shows what the voltage in an LRC circuit is due to thermal noise, and then says that the power distribution (with respect to angular velocity) is the following:
P(w)dw=(2/pi)ktdw
Now I have two problems. First, I do not understand where this comes from. At that point he says merely that it will be proven later, and the later proof is unhelpful and vague. The second problem is that the above formula does not check out with dimensional analysis. Power is in terms of J/s, kt is in terms of J, dw is /s, and cancels on both sides. Leaving
J/s=J
Is it wrong or am I missing something?
The later explanation that is given is that the noise generator in a circuit with resonance (adjustable) can be described as the signal received from an antenna due to thermal radiation emitted from the surrounding environment. This he shows (and I follow the explanation for this part) to be proportional to I(w)=w^2*(kt)/(pi^2c^2), and the correction for high temperature or low frequency is also shown, where I is the intensity of the radiation. It seems to me that Power=Area*Intensity, and so it would depend on the size of the antenna. Can anyone explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I understand it. I found an explanation using two resistors in series and standing voltage waves. What I don't understand now is his derivation of P from the spectral distribution for a black body radiator. As far as I understand it, he says this:
1. The black body radiator can be considered to be an individual atom, containing an electron that is allowed to vibrate as a harmonic oscillator. This atom must gain and lose energy at the same rate in order for it to be at thermal equilibrium in a box full of gas.
2. The equation for the root mean square voltage in an LRC circuit is w^2*LkT
Both of those statements, as well as the subsequent derivation for a black body radiator, I agree with. The problem is how the radiator relates to the thermal noise.
 
Fr33Fa11 said:
Ok, I think I understand it. I found an explanation using two resistors in series and standing voltage waves. What I don't understand now is his derivation of P from the spectral distribution for a black body radiator. As far as I understand it, he says this:
1. The black body radiator can be considered to be an individual atom, containing an electron that is allowed to vibrate as a harmonic oscillator. This atom must gain and lose energy at the same rate in order for it to be at thermal equilibrium in a box full of gas.
2. The equation for the root mean square voltage in an LRC circuit is w^2*LkTBoth of those statements, as well as the subsequent derivation for a black body radiator, I agree with. The problem is how the radiator relates to the thermal noise.
Neither inductors nor capacitors can be sources of thermal noise. Only resistors can be the source of noise, but inductances and capacitors can define bandwidth. So it is better to write the noise voltage with an "R" in it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K