Josephson Effect: SNS Junction & Self-Generated Current

  • Thread starter Thread starter chientewu
  • Start date Start date
chientewu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am confused about josephson effect. Take SNS for example. If the phase of these two superconductors are different, then there will be a josephson current through the junction. Experimentally, do we measure the current by attach two ends of SNS with a wire? If there is no wire attached to these two ends, will there be a current flowing through the junction? In other words, will there be a self-generated current in it without a loop?

Thanks for you help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you measure it by passing a current through the junction and then measuring the voltage across it.

And no, there won't be "self generated" current.
The only time you would get a current through a junction not connected by a wire is if it is part of a loop that is being threaded by a changing flux (i.e. an RF- SQUID).
 
Thanks for your quick reply. Now I am confused about your statement "measure it by passing a current through the junction and then measuring the voltage across it." It means we have to pass a current through the junction, otherwise there will be no current? Is it correct. Thanks.
 
Yes, the current-voltage characheristics of JJs are measured in exactly the same way as for example semiconductor diods; you use current source to bias it and then a voltmeter to measure the voltage across it (you can do it the other way aorund, using a voltage source and an ammeter; but this is quite tricky since the impedance of the junction is practically zero when you are on the supercurrent branch).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top