Joule's Apparatus and Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Joule's apparatus, which demonstrates the conversion of potential energy into internal energy through the falling of two blocks that stir water. It clarifies that while the blocks possess kinetic energy during their fall, this energy is partially converted into rotational kinetic energy of the water, leading to a slower fall rate. The conversation highlights the importance of accounting for kinetic energy and calorimetry in experimental design, emphasizing that Joule's findings effectively challenged the calorimic theory of heat.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Joule's apparatus and its function
  • Knowledge of potential and kinetic energy concepts
  • Familiarity with calorimetry principles
  • Basic grasp of mechanical energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanical equivalent of heat and its historical context
  • Explore advanced calorimetry techniques for accurate measurements
  • Study the relationship between kinetic energy and rotational motion
  • Investigate Joule's experiments and their implications on thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in thermodynamics, energy conversion, and historical experiments in heat theory.

Bennigan88
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
In my textbook, Joule's apparatus (two blocks falling from height h turn a paddle that stirs and increases the internal energy of water) is claimed to convert the potential energy of the two blocks into internal energy that can be measured by the increase in temperature of the water... but what happens to the kinetic energy of the blocks as they are falling? They have velocity and mass so there must be kinetic energy, how is that accounted for in the setup of the apparatus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That has to be factored into the experimental design and the final calculation of course. If your book claimed that all the falling energy becomes heat then your book is in error - but I suspect they do not make such a claim.

The kinetic energy of the blocks is less than if there was no water... they fall slower.
The water also gains rotational kinetic energy, and there are issues with calorimetry.
All these can be taken into account in a careful setup. Joule worked out the mechanical energy deficit and demonstrated that this was consistent with the heat increase in the water. The experiment more easily disproves the, then accepted, calorimic theory of heat that treated heat as a substance in it's own right.
See also:
http://www.eoearth.org/article/On_the_Mechanical_Equivalent_of_Heat_(historical)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K