B Just for fun: Cubic Graph Plot

AI Thread Summary
Desmos.com is highlighted as an effective online graphing tool for experimenting with the Newton-Raphson method, particularly in solving cubic equations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately calculating x-intercepts and turning points on cubic graphs, suggesting that additional iterations may improve precision. A specific example is provided for finding square roots using the positive x-intercept of the function f(x)=x^2-a, with a comparison to a more accurate numeric value. Users are encouraged to explore the provided links for practical applications of these concepts. Overall, the thread showcases the utility of Desmos for mathematical experimentation and visualization.
neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
683
TL;DR Summary
Cubic Graph plot on Desmos
Desmos.com is a great online graphing utility which I'm sure is familiar to many PF users. I wanted to experiment with the Newton-Raphson method using it so chose solution of cubic graphs as an example. The graph shows a variable cubic on which all turning points and intercepts are calculated and shown. x-intercepts by Newton-Raphson.

I'm sure readers will find parameter values where the x-intercepts are not that accurate - in that case add a couple more "g(g(.." iterations!

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/lejtdd8fws
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and jim mcnamara
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's another use of Newton-Raphson whereby the square root of a number is determined by finding the positive x-intercept of ##f(x)=x^2-a##. The intercept is marked on the graph but the side panel shows a more accurate numeric value of the root against parameter d where ##d=\sqrt{a}##. The start value for determination of the square root is the square root of the nearest square greater than a.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/qbyev8tuqz
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
868
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top