Calculus Just got Courant's calculus text -- Need some tips to work through it

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of Courant's "Calculus Volume 1" as a primary textbook for learning calculus. The user seeks guidance on potential errors, important topics to focus on, and supplementary problem books. They have a solid mathematical background, with knowledge from Spivak's work and experience in proof techniques. The consensus is that while Courant's book is comprehensive, it contains fewer problems, which may not be sufficient for thorough practice. Spivak is noted as a modern interpretation of Courant, suggesting that the two can be used in conjunction. The advice emphasizes the importance of engaging directly with the material, as the challenges will remain regardless of preparation. Overall, the discussion encourages diving into the text and tackling the complexities of calculus head-on.
Mr.Husky
Gold Member
Messages
89
Reaction score
28
Hi everyone!

I just bought the courant John calculus volume-1 from uni bookstore. I need some tips like errors, topics which are not explained well and topics which are really important and need to focus more on etc..

My background:- have Spivak as a supplement. Knows how to prove and read theorems( from the book how to prove it ).Halfway through schaum's outline of matrices.
IMG_20211109_102059.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't recall any glaring errors in Courant. I have the first edition without FritzJohn? as coauthor.

Everything is important in Courant :).
 
Thanks @MidgetDwarf , Good to hear that.
 
There are less problems in this book. Are they enough to test my theory? Can someone recommend me a problem book which is at this level?(can I solve problems in Spivak with theory of courant?)
 
yes, spivak is essentially a modern version of courant. i.e. spivak himself perhaps took calculus from courant (i.e. Courant's book) and then wrote his own take on the material, with some proofs lifted from courant, but with many additions and elaborations.

Basically you just need to start digging into the book, without worrying any more about what problems you will encounter. No matter what preparation you make, it will still be challenging. I advise just opening it. (Of course I also need that advice myself in my current projects!) Good luck! (to us both.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Mr.Husky, PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
Thanks mathwonk for your advice.
 
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top