K-value missing in acid-base problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the initial concentration of HF needed for a solution with a pH of 1.5, the Ka value of HF is essential. The discussion highlights that the K value for water is not relevant, and instead, the focus should be on the dissociation constant of HF. Participants suggest checking textbooks or resources for the Ka value if it hasn't been provided. Without this value, solving the problem accurately is challenging. Understanding the relationship between pH and concentration through the Ka value is crucial for finding the solution.
alingy2
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
What initial concentration of HF (aq) in water would give a solution with a pH = 1.5?

I think the K value is missing... How could we solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alingy2 said:
What initial concentration of HF (aq) in water would give a solution with a pH = 1.5?

I think the K value is missing... How could we solve this problem?

Hey there!
I'm sure you know the K of water - what you're looking for is the Ka value of HF. Have you not been given the value?
 
Is there a table of Ka values in your book?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry How to take into account autoprotolysis in weak base solution?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Chemistry Book seems to say that we can have weak acid and weak conjugate base
Replies
2
Views
1K
Chemistry How to calculate pH at equivalence point using this alternative?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Chemistry Understanding how to calculate pH of a buffer solution
Replies
2
Views
1K
Chemistry Comparing methods of computing pH at equivalence point in titration
Replies
4
Views
1K
Chemistry How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)
Replies
2
Views
3K
Chemistry Are there typos in this snippet causing confusion?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Chemistry Moles of NaOH to Create Buffer Solution pH=6 in 0.42M Ethanoic Acid
Replies
3
Views
3K
Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Titration of acetic acid w/ NaOH problem
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top