K-Vector Function of Space in EM Waves: Implications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the k-vector in electromagnetic waves and its potential spatial dependence. It is noted that if the refractive index (n) of a medium varies in space, the k-vector would also vary accordingly. In the case of non-planar waves, such as spherical waves, the direction of the k-vector is determined by the location relative to the source. The k-vector is often treated as a scalar, simplifying the analysis, as it represents the gradient of the wave's phase. The conversation highlights the complexity of understanding the k-vector's role in wave propagation and its implications in varying mediums.
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
Is it possible for the k-vector to be a function of space (in the context of EM waves)? What would it imply if this was the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I know that the k-vector can be related to a wave's frequency (this is called a dispersion relation). Is that what you were asking about?
 
No... I was just curious about the spatial dependence of the k-vector (if such a thing is possible).
 
If the n of the medium varied in space, then so would k.
k=nw/c
 
In a non-planar wave (e.g. a spherical wave radiating from a pointlike source), the direction of \vec k obviously depends on location.
 
jtbell said:
In a non-planar wave (e.g. a spherical wave radiating from a pointlike source), the direction of \vec k obviously depends on location.

The equation for a spherical wave is
e^\left(ik|\mathbf{r-r}_0|\right)

k doesn't depend on direction
 
That equation contains only the magnitude of the vector \vec k, whose direction is always away from the source (located at {\vec r}_0):

\vec k = k \frac{\vec r - {\vec r_0}}{|\vec r - {\vec r_0}|} = \left( \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \right) \frac{\vec r - {\vec r_0}}{|\vec r - {\vec r_0}|}
 
jtbell said:
That equation contains only the magnitude of the vector \vec k, whose direction is always away from the source (located at {\vec r}_0):

\vec k = k \frac{\vec r - {\vec r_0}}{|\vec r - {\vec r_0}|} = \left( \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \right) \frac{\vec r - {\vec r_0}}{|\vec r - {\vec r_0}|}

I see what you're saying, but it's easier to treat k as a scalar in this case, where k has no dependence on direction.
 
The wave vector can probably best thought of as
"the gradient of the phase of the wave". Thus, one can visualize it as fields of vectors perpendicular to the wavefronts.

(The physical quantity described by the "k-vector" is actually more naturally thought of as a "covector" (or "one-form"), but that's another story.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top