Calculating Ka for Acid-Base Indicators

  • Thread starter Thread starter magma_saber
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To estimate the acid dissociation constant (Ka) for acid-base indicators, the color change ratios of [In-]/[HIn] at 1/10 and 10/1 are used alongside measured hydronium ion concentrations. The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is applicable, indicating that the pH values for color changes should be two units apart, which is not observed in the current results. The calculated pH differences suggest significant experimental errors, particularly with the bromophenol blue indicator. The pKa value is expected to lie between the pH values where color changes occur, but the current data does not support this. Accurate measurements and proper calculations are essential for reliable Ka estimates.
magma_saber
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Estimate the Ka the using the assumption that the color change can be seen by our eyes when [ln-]/[Hln] = 1/10
to see the acid form or [ln-]/[Hln] = 10/1 to see the color associated with the base.
Use these numbers with your measured [H+] to calculate a Ka for each indicator you measured.

Homework Equations


acid-base base-acid H+
Phenolphthalein 8.7 7.4 8.91E-09

I got the hydronium concentration by taking taking the average of the ph values and doing 10^-ph. How do i get the ka estimates?

Do i set up the equation like this: ka = 1/[H+] or something like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Describe the experiment that you did. I am almost sure you have not posted all information that you have.
 
Last edited:
am49vo.jpg
 
ya i know that the phs are wrong. The bromophenol blue was really off. When calculating the H+ concentration, i only used 4.2, not 9.3.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top