Kikuchiyo's two pictures of time

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pictures Time
AI Thread Summary
Kikuchiyo presented two animated pictures of time, focusing on a timeline and a falling-leaves representation. The discussion emphasizes understanding the falling-leaves picture through the lens of mathematical concepts like linear and partial ordering. It highlights that overlapping leaves can indicate a transitive relation, suggesting a deeper understanding of time as a partial-ordered set rather than a linear sequence. The conversation references a paper on quantum causal histories, which describes events as a locally finite partial-ordered set, linking this to concepts in quantum gravity and information theory. Ultimately, the notion is proposed that time may be more complex than a straightforward linear progression.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
Over in "Theoretical" forum a new poster kikuchiyo put up two animated pictures of time.

A. http://homepage.mac.com/aglaser/time.swf

B. http://homepage.mac.com/aglaser/time2.swf

one is the time-line picture and the other is the falling-leaves picture

I think one's focus should not be "Which picture is right?" but
"How do I understand the falling leaves picture?"

In mathematical terms the difference is between a "linear ordering" and a "partial ordering" relation

if two leaves overlap you can tell which precedes which
and presumably its a transitive relation (yes, kikuchiyo?) which
means that if A precedes B precedes C then A precedes C

the partial ordering idea has interested mathematicians and they have learned some things about partial orderings
there is also the idea of a "directed set" which is a little stronger than a partial ordering but still not a linear ordering----a directed set allows taking limits and some interesting collections of things turn out to be partial-ordered and in some cases directed.
It seems like not a bad idea to see if time can be understood in these terms
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0302111

I just had a look at a paper dated August 2003 (though numbered as if earlier) called "Evolution in Quantum Causal Histories" by Fotini Markopoulos, Eli Hawkins, and Hanno Sahlmann

Sure enough a quantum causal history is a locally finite partial-ordered set

in classical GR spacetime the events form a partial-ordered set---that is the mathematical realization of causality

two events x and y are "spatially separated" if neither precedes the other in the ordering

they go over all the definitions and it seems nice


For quantum gravity, she just throws away the spacetime manifold and all she has left is a partial-ordered set of events
and she attaches to each event a finite dimensional Hilbert space

and then she starts describing structures that other people study using this: for instance she describes spinfoam models of spacetime and
algebraic quantum field theory (whatever that is)
quantum information theory (ditto)

I suspect that if time exists at all there's more to it than a straight line

maybe I didnt say it clearly enough: kikuchiyo animated picture B is of a locally finite partial-ordered set (if you had to give a general mathematical description)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top