Killing vectors in Robertson-Walker mertric

  • Thread starter paweld
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Vectors
In summary, the conversation discusses a metric that describes a spatially homogeneous universe. It can be expressed in different coordinates and admits killing vectors for rotations. The metric also has translation symmetry, but it is not apparent in the given coordinates. The conversation then brings up the possibility of considering the k=1 case and discusses the implications of omitting k.
  • #1
paweld
255
0
Let's consider the following metric:
[tex]
g=dt^2 - a^2(t)\frac{dx^2+dy^2+dz^2}{1+\frac{x^2+y^2+z^2}{4}}
[/tex]
It can be also express in different coordinates as:
[tex]
g=dt^2 - a^2(t)\left( \frac{dr^2}{1-r^2} + r^2(\sin^2(\theta) d\varphi^2+\theta^2) \right)
[/tex]

Of course it admits killing vetctors which are generators of rotations:
[tex]
L_z=x\partial_y - y\partial_x, \ldots
[/tex]
Can anyone found different killing vector?
This metric describes spatialy homogenous universe so it should have
translation symmetry but it's not apparent in this coordinates.
Why it's hidden?
Thanks for any replies.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sorry for picking this up so late. Did you mean to omit [itex]k[/itex], i.e., did you mean to consider only the [itex]k = 1[/itex] case? If so, do you know do which Riemannian manifold models each spatial section, and can you guess what the spatial isometry group is?

It might be helpful to consider first the [itex]k=0[/itex] case.
 
  • #3


The Robertson-Walker metric is a solution to Einstein's field equations that describes a homogeneous and isotropic universe. As such, it should have translation symmetry, meaning that the metric should remain unchanged under translations in space. However, in the given coordinates, it is not immediately apparent that there is translation symmetry.

To understand why this symmetry is hidden, we need to look at the Killing vectors in this metric. Killing vectors are vector fields that preserve the metric, meaning that they leave the metric unchanged when acted upon. In other words, they represent symmetries of the metric.

In the given metric, we can see that there are three Killing vectors that correspond to rotations in the x, y, and z directions. These are represented by the generators L_x, L_y, and L_z, respectively. However, these are not the only Killing vectors in this metric.

Another Killing vector that is often overlooked is the generator of time translations, which is given by:

L_t=\partial_t

This vector represents the symmetry of the metric under translations in time. In other words, it tells us that the metric remains unchanged at different points in time.

So why is this symmetry hidden? It is because of the choice of coordinates. In the given coordinates, the metric appears to have a time-dependent term, a(t), multiplying the spatial terms. However, if we transform to a different set of coordinates, such as comoving coordinates, where the spatial coordinates are scaled by the expansion factor a(t), we can see that the metric becomes time-independent:

g=dt^2 - dr^2 - r^2(\sin^2(\theta) d\varphi^2+\theta^2)

In these coordinates, it is clear that the metric has translation symmetry, with the time coordinate remaining unchanged under translations.

In summary, the Robertson-Walker metric does have translation symmetry, but it is hidden in the given coordinates due to the choice of coordinates. The existence of the time translation Killing vector shows that the metric remains unchanged at different points in time, and thus has translation symmetry.
 

1. What is the significance of Killing vectors in the Robertson-Walker metric?

Killing vectors are a set of vector fields that represent the symmetries of a given spacetime. In the context of the Robertson-Walker metric, they represent the symmetries of an expanding universe. These symmetries are important because they help us understand the behavior of matter and energy in the universe.

2. How many Killing vectors are there in the Robertson-Walker metric?

The number of Killing vectors in the Robertson-Walker metric depends on the dimension of the spacetime. In 4-dimensional spacetime, which is the most commonly used in cosmology, there are 10 Killing vectors.

3. Can the Killing vectors in the Robertson-Walker metric change over time?

No, the Killing vectors in the Robertson-Walker metric are time-independent. This is because the symmetries of the universe, represented by the Killing vectors, do not change over time. However, the coefficients of the metric may change over time due to the expansion of the universe.

4. How do Killing vectors affect the motion of particles in the Robertson-Walker metric?

Killing vectors determine the conserved quantities of a particle's motion in the Robertson-Walker metric. These conserved quantities, such as energy and angular momentum, dictate the path of the particle in spacetime. In an expanding universe, the conserved quantities may change over time due to the changing scale factor, resulting in different trajectories for particles.

5. Can Killing vectors be used to solve the Einstein field equations in the Robertson-Walker metric?

Yes, Killing vectors can be used to simplify the Einstein field equations in the Robertson-Walker metric. By applying the symmetries represented by the Killing vectors, the number of independent equations can be reduced, making it easier to find solutions to the equations.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
761
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
624
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
900
Back
Top