Kinematic equation without time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the kinematic equation that omits time, specifically the equation V02 + 2a(x - x0) = 2V0V + V2. The user initially struggles with the term 2V0V and seeks clarification on the steps to derive the equation correctly. The resolution involves correctly expanding (V - V0)², which reveals the cancellation of -2V0V, thus simplifying the equation. The importance of careful algebraic manipulation and term counting is emphasized to avoid common mistakes in deriving kinematic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematic equations
  • Familiarity with algebraic expansion techniques
  • Knowledge of acceleration (a) and initial/final velocity (V0, V)
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving variables and constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the kinematic equations in physics
  • Practice algebraic expansion with a focus on binomials
  • Learn about the implications of omitting time in kinematic equations
  • Explore common mistakes in algebra and strategies to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone looking to improve their algebraic manipulation skills in the context of motion equations.

Bakatota
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I understand most of the kinematic equations, but there is just this one equation that omits time from the equation. I always end up with V02+2a(x - x0) = 2V0V + V2

The 2V0V part is what I don't understand how to get rid of. So if you please could you do the equation with steps , I would be very grateful. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the steps you took to get to that equation?
 
t = (V - V0)/a

x - x0 = V0((V-V0)/a) + .5a((V - V0/a)2)

x - x0 = (V0V - V02)/a + (V2 + V02)/2a

2a(x - x0) = 2V0V -2V02 + V2 +V02

V02+2a(x - x0) = 2V0V + V2
 
What do you get if you expand ##(V-V_0)^2##?

Edit: By the way, something seems to be wrong with the brackets in the last term of your second equation. I assumed that was just a typo, but if they look right to you then you need tk think about that too.
 
Last edited:
Oh I see what I did wrong. As you intimated, I did not expand (V - V0)2 correctly. Now I have -2V0V to cancel out.
 
That's right. Algebraic slips can be hard to spot. I sometimes write each term on a separate line when I'm expanding brackets, which makes it easier for me to not get distracted when I'm doing it. Then when I'm collecting terms together I put a little tick above each one as I copy it on to the next line so I don't lose one or double one up by accident. You can also count terms. You know that ##(V-V_0)^2## should give you three terms when expanded - that would have caught this error because your expansion only had two.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K