Kinematics problem but no numbers given?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a car and a dragster, where the car travels at a constant speed while the dragster accelerates from rest. Participants express confusion over how to solve the problem without specific numerical values, particularly regarding the time of collision (tmax) and the initial distance between the two vehicles. The consensus is to derive algebraic expressions first and then substitute numerical values later. Key points include the need to account for the car's initial position and the condition that both vehicles must have the same speed at the moment of potential collision. Ultimately, participants clarify that the distance from the dragster when it starts accelerating can be determined by setting the positions of both vehicles equal at tmax.
  • #31
That just means that the drag racer waits until he knows the car will just miss his bumper at the later time t = t_max. So when the dragster starts off there is a certain distance (i.e. d_start) between him and the car. If he started just before the car hit him then there would definitely be a crash unless the dragser could accelerate almost instantly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Kurdt said:
That just means that the drag racer waits until he knows the car will just miss his bumper at the later time t = t_max. So when the dragster starts off there is a certain distance (i.e. d_start) between him and the car. If he started just before the car hit him then there would definitely be a crash unless the dragser could accelerate almost instantly.

ok... but since it's a distance, not a vector, it shouldn't have a negative sign for the answer... and when I plug in the givens to d = 1/2at^2 - v1t, I get a negative answer... ;;
 
  • #33
From the way the question is set up it is in the negative x direction if you like. To make it work in the equations it must have a minus sign that is.
 
  • #34
Kurdt said:
From the way the question is set up it is in the negative x direction if you like. To make it work in the equations it must have a minus sign that is.

so practically, i found the displacement...
a distance can't have a negative sign, right? is there a way to cancel it out somehow?? because it says in the question that the answer for the distance should never be negative.
 
  • #35
Yes, just leave the minus sign out. :smile:
 
  • #36
so... if v = 25m/s and a = 50m/s^2..
i get a negative answer...
but just write it as a positive?!
 
  • #37
just changing the negative answer to a positive answer is allowed?!
 
  • #38
What you're doing is finding the magnitude of a vector, except since this is 1D the magnitude will be \sqrt{-s_0^2}.
 
  • #39
ummm.. kurdt?
big problem here...
after all this work, the computer says tmax does not equal v/a...
it says that it doesn't depend on the variable, v...
what do i do? T.T
maybe technical error? should it be v0?
 
  • #40
It should certainly depend on the speed of the car.
 
  • #41
ok technical mistake whew!
i had to write v_0 / a
now... for dstart... since this is really sensitive about technicality...
i shoud write dstart = 1/2atmax^2 -v_0tmax right? not just t?
 
  • #42
I don't know the system but write whatever you think it will accept. :smile:
 
  • #43
i wrote d_start = 1/2at_max^2 - v_0t_max...
and it says it contains an incorrect multiplier or is missing one... huh?!
 
  • #44
I have no experience with these things. I used to hand in bits of paper with squiggles on. I suggest seeing if the thing has a FAQ or is there anyone around that you can ask for advice? A tutor maybe.
 
  • #45
so you don't think there's anything wrong with the equation, just physics wise?
 
  • #46
No it looks fine.
 
  • #47
Kurdt said:
No it looks fine.

soo... according to our teacher, there may be something wrong with the equation itself..T.T
not the way I input it...
he said I'm figuring out "your distance from the dragster when he started". and that i shouldn't forget the additional point
made in this question about assuming that the dragster starts at x=0 when t=0.

d_start = 1/2at_max^2 - v_0t_max

I honestly can't figure out what's wrong...
why would it say incorrect multiplier or is missing one?? grr what is wrong with this equation??
 
Last edited:
  • #48
Well that's exactly what you have done and is the reason that extra distance term appears in the cars distance equation. I'm just thinking the distance equation for the car might have to subtract the the distance since it starts behind the dragster and the direction they travel in is defined positive.
 
  • #49
Kurdt said:
Well that's exactly what you have done and is the reason that extra distance term appears in the cars distance equation. I'm just thinking the distance equation for the car might have to subtract the the distance since it starts behind the dragster and the direction they travel in is defined positive.

...
I'm still not quite sure how to change the equation to make it right..
subtract which distance?
ahhh i don't get it...!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K