Kinematics no number solution question issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrjoe2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a collision scenario between a car and a dragster. The original poster seeks to determine the maximum time before a collision occurs, given that the dragster accelerates from rest while the car maintains a constant speed.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of using the equation v=d/t for this scenario, questioning its applicability due to the acceleration of the dragster. There is an exploration of kinematic equations as a more suitable approach. The original poster expresses confusion about the nature of the answer, wondering if it should be an expression rather than a numerical solution.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the need for kinematic equations. There is recognition of the original poster's misunderstanding of the equations applicable to the problem, and a clarification that the answer is expected to be an expression rather than a specific number.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem requires consideration of both constant velocity and accelerating motion, leading to discussions about the limitations of certain equations in this context. The original poster indicates they are a first-year university physics student, which may influence their understanding of the concepts involved.

mrjoe2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
To demonstrate the tremendous acceleration of a top fuel drag racer, you attempt to run your car into the back of a dragster that is "burning out" at the red light before the start of a race. (Burning out means spinning the tires at high speed to heat the tread and make the rubber sticky.)

You drive at a constant speed of v0 toward the stopped dragster, not slowing down in the face of the imminent collision. The dragster driver sees you coming but waits until the last instant to put down the hammer, accelerating from the starting line at constant acceleration, a . Let the time at which the dragster starts to accelerate be t=0 .

What is tmax, the longest time after the dragster begins to accelerate that you can possibly run into the back of the dragster if you continue at your initial velocity?




i believe the only equation that would be required is v=d/t. it is the only one that i used but still got the incorrect answer.



when i worked it out i thought the answer would be delta d/vo, but it wasnt the correct answer. it seemed perfect for an expression as an answer to the maximum time it would take for the car to collide with the dragster because when the dragster reaches vo which is the speed of the car, that's the last possible time they could possible collide right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrjoe2 said:
To demonstrate the tremendous acceleration of a top fuel drag racer, you attempt to run your car into the back of a dragster that is "burning out" at the red light before the start of a race. (Burning out means spinning the tires at high speed to heat the tread and make the rubber sticky.)

You drive at a constant speed of v0 toward the stopped dragster, not slowing down in the face of the imminent collision. The dragster driver sees you coming but waits until the last instant to put down the hammer, accelerating from the starting line at constant acceleration, a . Let the time at which the dragster starts to accelerate be t=0 .

What is tmax, the longest time after the dragster begins to accelerate that you can possibly run into the back of the dragster if you continue at your initial velocity?

i believe the only equation that would be required is v=d/t. it is the only one that i used but still got the incorrect answer.
when i worked it out i thought the answer would be delta d/vo, but it wasnt the correct answer. it seemed perfect for an expression as an answer to the maximum time it would take for the car to collide with the dragster because when the dragster reaches vo which is the speed of the car, that's the last possible time they could possible collide right?
The equation v=d/t is only valid for constant velocity and not when an object is accelerating. I would suggest that the problem is best tackled using kinematic equations.
 
Hootenanny said:
The equation v=d/t is only valid for constant velocity and not when an object is accelerating. I would suggest that the problem is best tackled using kinematic equations.

i understand that, however, the question is asking for a specific point in time, which is at a certain velocity, and not during the time the dragster is accelerating. ( i am first year university physics and it is quite hard for me)
 
mrjoe2 said:
i understand that, however, the question is asking for a specific point in time, which is at a certain velocity, and not during the time the dragster is accelerating. ( i am first year university physics and it is quite hard for me)
Whilst that is true, v=d/t is not valid at a specific point in time, the equation requires a change in distance and a change in time and should really be written:

v = \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}
 
Hootenanny said:
Whilst that is true, v=d/t is not valid at a specific point in time, the equation requires a change in distance and a change in time and should really be written:

v = \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}

that was my original solution. i rearranged v = dd/dt to get dtmax = dd/vo and i thought that would be the solution. but it was incorrect. is there anything that you can do to lead me to a correct expression that would be a solution to this question?
 
mrjoe2 said:
that was my original solution. i rearranged v = dd/dt to get dtmax = dd/vo and i thought that would be the solution. but it was incorrect. is there anything that you can do to lead me to a correct expression that would be a solution to this question?
As I've said previously, your solution was incorrect simply because that equation is not valid for accelerating objects, nor at an instant in time. You need to use kinematic (SUVAT) equations to solve this problem.
 
Hootenanny said:
As I've said previously, your solution was incorrect simply because that equation is not valid for accelerating objects, nor at an instant in time. You need to use kinematic (SUVAT) equations to solve this problem.

just to make clear. there is no solid number answer to this question right? it is an expression?
 
mrjoe2 said:
just to make clear. there is no solid number answer to this question right? it is an expression?
Correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K